Nanomaterials (Dec 2018)
Effects of Ultrasonic Dispersion Energy on the Preparation of Amorphous SiO2 Nanomaterials for In Vitro Toxicity Testing
Abstract
Synthetic amorphous silica (SAS) constitute a large group of industrial nanomaterials (NM). Based on their different production processes, SAS can be distinguished as precipitated, fumed, gel and colloidal. The biological activity of SAS, e.g., cytotoxicity or inflammatory potential in the lungs is low but has been shown to depend on the particle size, at least for colloidal silica. Therefore, the preparation of suspensions from highly aggregated or agglomerated SAS powder materials is critical. Here we analyzed the influence of ultrasonic dispersion energy on the biologic activity of SAS using NR8383 alveolar macrophage (AM) assay. Fully characterized SAS (7 precipitated, 3 fumed, 3 gel, and 1 colloidal) were dispersed in H2O by stirring and filtering through a 5 µm filter. Aqueous suspensions were sonicated with low or high ultrasonic dispersion (USD) energy of 18 or 270 kJ/mL, respectively. A dose range of 11.25–90 µg/mL was administered to the AM under protein-free conditions to detect particle-cell interactions without the attenuating effect of proteins that typically occur in vivo. The release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), glucuronidase (GLU), and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF) were measured after 16 h. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) production was assayed after 90 min. The overall pattern of the in vitro response to SAS (12/14) was clearly dose-dependent, except for two SAS which showed very low bioactivity. High USD energy gradually decreased the particle size of precipitated, fumed, and gel SAS whereas the low adverse effect concentrations (LOECs) remained unchanged. Nevertheless, the comparison of dose-response curves revealed slight, but uniform shifts in EC50 values (LDH, and partially GLU) for precipitated SAS (6/7), gel SAS (2/3), and fumed SAS (3/3). Release of TNF changed inconsistently with higher ultrasonic dispersion (USD) energy whereas the induction of H2O2 was diminished in all cases. Electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray analysis showed an uptake of SAS into endosomes, lysosomes, endoplasmic reticulum, and different types of phagosomes. The possible effects of different uptake routes are discussed. The study shows that the effect of increased USD energy on the in vitro bioactivity of SAS is surprisingly small. As the in vitro response of AM to different SAS is highly uniform, the production process per se is of minor relevance for toxicity.
Keywords
