Digital Health (Jun 2024)

A rapid review protocol of physiotherapy and occupational therapy telerehabilitation to inform ethical and equity concerns

  • Mirella Veras,
  • Jennifer Sigouin,
  • Claudine Auger,
  • Louis-Pierre Auger,
  • Sara Ahmed,
  • Zachary Boychuck,
  • Sabrina Cavallo,
  • Martine Lévesque,
  • Stacey Lovo,
  • William C Miller,
  • Michelle Nelson,
  • Nahid Norouzi-Gheidari,
  • Jennifer O’Neil,
  • Kadija Perreault,
  • Reg Urbanowski,
  • Lisa Sheehy,
  • Hardeep Singh,
  • Claude Vincent,
  • Rosali Wang,
  • Diana Zidarov,
  • Anne Hudon,
  • Dahlia Kairy

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241260367
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10

Abstract

Read online

Background Telerehabilitation (TR) has emerged as a feasible and promising approach for delivering rehabilitation services remotely, utilizing technology to bridge the gap between healthcare providers and patients. As new modalities of virtual care and health technologies continue to emerge, it is crucial to stay informed about the growing landscape of virtual care to ensure that telehealth service delivery is ethical and equitable, and improves the quality of services and patient outcomes. Objective The primary objective of this article is to present the protocol of a rapid review to examine the equity-related aspects surrounding the implementation of TR. This includes a comprehensive analysis of the ethical dimensions and fairness concerns linked to this practice. Methods A rapid review protocol was developed in accordance with Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Guidance. Medline and EMBASE databases were searched between January 2010 and March 2023. Study selection and data extraction will be conducted in two phases (Phase I) by two independent reviewers and subsequently (Phase II) by a single reviewer. Our study will utilize the PROGRESS-Plus and Equitable virtual rehabilitation in the metaverse era framework to identify dimensions where potential inequities may exist within TR interventions. Results This rapid review is anticipated to enhance our knowledge of TR in the fields of physiotherapy and occupational therapy, with a specific focus on its influence on ethical and equitable practices and providing a foundation for informed decision-making and improved patient care. Conclusion This rapid review will contribute to the advancement of our understanding of TR within physiotherapy and occupational therapy. Through synthesizing existing evidence, this study not only addresses current gaps in knowledge but also offers valuable insights for future research and clinical practice in TR services.