Journal of the Formosan Medical Association (Aug 2020)

Fluoroscopic-guided nasogastric tube placement in patients with advanced head and neck cancers

  • Po-Ting Chen,
  • Bo-Ching Lee,
  • Yu-Cheng Huang,
  • Yu-Chien Chang,
  • Hsieh-Ling Tzeng,
  • Kao-Lang Liu

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 119, no. 8
pp. 1320 – 1324

Abstract

Read online

Background/Purpose: Enteral feeding, mainly by using a nasogastric tube (NGT), is generally favored over parenteral supplementation in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients with dysphagia. However, the placement of a NGT, either blindly or by endoscopy, is technically challenging in these patients due to the obstructive mass and the altered regional anatomy. The aim of this retrospective study was to estimate the clinical feasibility and safety of fluoroscopic-guided NGT placement in patients with advanced HNC. Methods: Between January 2010 and June 2018, a total of 572 fluoroscopic-guided NGT placements were performed on 231 patients. Technical success was defined as successful insertion of the NGT into the stomach with proper positioning, which was verified by air injection into the NGT. Complications, including aspiration pneumonia, and the ones requiring intensive care, or procedure-related death, were recorded. Results: Technical success was obtained in 558 (97.6%) procedures, and the other 14 (2.4%) procedures failed because of patient intolerance (n = 1) and high-grade obstruction (n = 13). Of the high-grade obstruction patients, eight (61.5%) were shifted to percutaneous radiological gastrostomy, two (15.4%) to surgical feeding jejunostomy, one (7.6%) to endoscopic balloon dilatation, and two (15.4%) to orogastric tube insertion. The average procedure time and fluoroscopy time were 11.7 ± 7.4 min and 3.1 ± 3.1 min, respectively. There were no major complications. Conclusion: Our results show that fluoroscopic-guided NGT placement is a highly safe and effective procedure for patients with advanced HNC requiring enteral feeding.

Keywords