AIDS Research and Therapy (Nov 2019)

Immediate versus deferred antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected patients presenting with acute AIDS-defining events (toxoplasmosis, Pneumocystis jirovecii-pneumonia): a prospective, randomized, open-label multicenter study (IDEAL-study)

  • Guido Schäfer,
  • Christian Hoffmann,
  • Keikawus Arasteh,
  • Dirk Schürmann,
  • Christoph Stephan,
  • Björn Jensen,
  • Matthias Stoll,
  • Johannes R. Bogner,
  • Gerd Faetkenheuer,
  • Jürgen Rockstroh,
  • Hartwig Klinker,
  • Georg Härter,
  • Albrecht Stöhr,
  • Olaf Degen,
  • Eric Freiwald,
  • Anja Hüfner,
  • Sabine Jordan,
  • Julian Schulze zur Wiesch,
  • Marylyn Addo,
  • Ansgar W. Lohse,
  • Jan van Lunzen,
  • Stefan Schmiedel,
  • the IDEAL study group

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-019-0250-2
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 1
pp. 1 – 8

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background To evaluate clinical outcomes after either immediate or deferred initiation of antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1-infected patients, presenting late with pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) or toxoplasma encephalitis (TE). Methods Phase IV, multicenter, prospective, randomized open-label clinical trial. Patients were randomized into an immediate therapy arm (starting antiretroviral therapy (ART) within 7 days after initiation of OI treatment) versus a deferred arm (starting ART after completing the OI-therapy). All patients were followed for 24 weeks. The rates of clinical progression (death, new or relapsing opportunistic infections (OI) and other grade 4 clinical endpoints) were compared, using a combined primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were hospitalization rates after completion of OI treatment, incidence of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS), virologic and immunological outcome, adherence to proteinase-inhibitor based antiretroviral therapy (ART) protocol and quality of life. Results 61 patients (11 patients suffering TE, 50 with PCP) were enrolled. No differences between the two therapy groups in all examined primary and secondary endpoints could be identified: immunological and virologic outcome was similar in both groups, there was no significant difference in the incidence of IRIS (11 and 10 cases), furthermore 9 events (combined endpoint of death, new/relapsing OI and grade 4 events) occurred in each group. Conclusions In summary, this study supports the notion that immediate initiation of ART with a ritonavir-boosted proteinase-inhibitor and two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors is safe and has no negative effects on incidence of disease progression or IRIS, nor on immunological and virologic outcomes or on quality of life.

Keywords