Journal of Clinical Medicine (Jun 2021)

Role of Concomitant Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Valve Surgery for Infective Endocarditis

  • Mahmoud Diab,
  • Thomas Lehmann,
  • Carolyn Weber,
  • Georgi Petrov,
  • Maximilian Luehr,
  • Payam Akhyari,
  • Sems-Malte Tugtekin,
  • P. Christian Schulze,
  • Marcus Franz,
  • Martin Misfeld,
  • Michael A. Borger,
  • Klaus Matschke,
  • Thorsten Wahlers,
  • Artur Lichtenberg,
  • Christian Hagl,
  • Torsten Doenst

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132867
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 13
p. 2867

Abstract

Read online

Background: It is current practice to perform concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with infective endocarditis (IE) who have relevant coronary artery disease (CAD). However, CABG may add complexity to the operation. We aimed to investigate the impact of concomitant CABG on perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for IE. Methods: We retrospectively used data of surgically treated IE patients between 1994 and 2018 in six German cardiac surgery centers. We performed inverse probability weighting (IPW), multivariable adjustment, chi-square analysis, and Kaplan–Meier survival estimates. Results: CAD was reported in 1242/4917 (25%) patients. Among them, 527 received concomitant CABG. After adjustment for basal characteristics between CABG and no-CABG patients using IPW, concomitant CABG was associated with higher postoperative stroke (26% vs. 21%, p = 0.003) and a trend towards higher postoperative hemodialysis (29% vs. 25%, p = 0.052). Thirty-day mortality was similar in both groups (24% vs. 23%, p = 0.370). Multivariate Cox regression analysis after IPW showed that CABG was not associated with better long-term survival (HR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.82–1.23, p = 0.998). Conclusion: In endocarditis patients with CAD, adding CABG to valve surgery may be associated with a higher likelihood of postoperative stroke without adding long-term survival benefits. Therefore, in the absence of critical CAD, concomitant CABG may be omitted without impacting outcome. The results are limited due to a lack of data on the severity of CAD, and therefore there is a need for a randomized trial.

Keywords