Frontiers in Endocrinology (Jun 2017)

Impact of Mid-Luteal Phase GnRH Agonist Administration on Reproductive Outcomes in GnRH Agonist-Triggered Cycles: A Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Abdelhamid Benmachiche,
  • Sebti Benbouhedja,
  • Abdelali Zoghmar,
  • Amel Boularak,
  • Peter Humaidan,
  • Peter Humaidan

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2017.00124
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8

Abstract

Read online

ObjectiveTo explore whether the addition of a mid-luteal bolus of GnRH agonist (GnRHa) improves the implantation rate (IR) in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles.DesignA randomized controlled trial.SettingPrivate IVF center.Patients328 IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients were triggered with GnRHa and received 1,500 IU HCG on the day of oocyte pick-up (OPU) in addition to a standard luteal phase support (LPS).Intervention(s)In addition, the study group received a bolus of GnRHa 6 days after OPU, whereas the control group did not.Main outcome measureImplantation rate.Secondary outcome measure(s)Ongoing pregnancy (OP) and live birth (LB) rates.ResultsAlthough serum concentrations of FSH, LH, E2, and P on day OPU + 7 were significantly higher in the study group compared to the control group, the IR was not statistically different between the treatment group (27%) and the control group (23%) [odds ratio (OR) 1.2 (95% CI 0.9–1.7), P < 0.27]. Similarly, the OP rate was 37% in the treatment group and 31% in the control group [OR 1.3 (95% CI 0.8–2.0), P < 0.23]. The LB rate was 36% in the treatment group and 31% in the control group [OR: 1.3 (95% CI 0.8–2.0), P < 0.27].ConclusionAlthough a trend toward a higher IR and pregnancy rate was observed in the treatment group, this difference was not statistically significant. However, the absolute risk difference of 5% found for LB is clinically relevant, warranting further investigation.NCT02053779.

Keywords