陆军军医大学学报 (Oct 2022)

Reliability and validity test of Ruminative Responses Scale in Chinese military personnel and its application

  • LIAO Xingya,
  • LIAO Xingya,
  • JIANG Hui,
  • ZHAO Mengxue,
  • ZHANG Xiaoling

DOI
https://doi.org/10.16016/j.2097-0927.202202092
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 44, no. 19
pp. 1954 – 1960

Abstract

Read online

Objective To test the reliability and validity of the Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS) in Chinese military personnel. Methods A total of 4 443 military personnel from 2 brigades in the Northern Theater Command were tested using Ruminative Responses scale(RRS), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and Negative Cognitive Processing Bias Questionnaire (NCPBQ). SPSS 22.0 and AMOS 26.0 were used for reliability and validity analysis. Results ① The 3-dimension model fitting indexes of RRS were within the standard range (RMSEA=0.074, GFI=0.887, RMR=0.018, CFI=0.922, IFI=0.922). ② All the scores for each item and factor of RRS showed significant positive correlations with the total score of the questionnaire (r=0.372~0.977, P < 0.01). ③ The correlation coefficients between each factor of RRS and PHQ-9 were 0.604~0.730, and those between each factor of RRS and NCPBQ were 0.615~0.741. ④ It was found that the Cronbach'α coefficients of the RRS were between 0.821 and 0.956, the split-half coefficients were between 0.845 and 0.918, the test-retest coefficients were between 0.671 and 0.894. Conclusion RRS is of high reliability and validity for measurement among military personnel.

Keywords