Journal of Personalized Medicine (Jul 2022)

Identification of Pathogenic Variant Burden and Selection of Optimal Diagnostic Method Is a Way to Improve Carrier Screening for Autosomal Recessive Diseases

  • Evgeniia A. Sotnikova,
  • Anna V. Kiseleva,
  • Vladimir A. Kutsenko,
  • Anastasia A. Zharikova,
  • Vasily E. Ramensky,
  • Mikhail G. Divashuk,
  • Yuri V. Vyatkin,
  • Marina V. Klimushina,
  • Alexandra I. Ershova,
  • Karina Z. Revazyan,
  • Olga P. Skirko,
  • Marija Zaicenoka,
  • Irina A. Efimova,
  • Maria S. Pokrovskaya,
  • Oksana V. Kopylova,
  • Anush M. Glechan,
  • Svetlana A. Shalnova,
  • Alexey N. Meshkov,
  • Oxana M. Drapkina

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12071132
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 7
p. 1132

Abstract

Read online

Cystic fibrosis, phenylketonuria, alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, and sensorineural hearing loss are among the most common autosomal recessive diseases, which require carrier screening. The evaluation of population allele frequencies (AF) of pathogenic variants in genes associated with these conditions and the choice of the best genotyping method are the necessary steps toward development and practical implementation of carrier-screening programs. We performed custom panel genotyping of 3821 unrelated participants from two Russian population representative samples and three patient groups using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and next generation sequencing (NGS). The custom panel included 115 known pathogenic variants in the CFTR, PAH, SERPINA1, and GJB2 genes. Overall, 38 variants were detected. The comparison of genotyping platforms revealed the following advantages of real-time PCR: relatively low cost, simple genotyping data analysis, and easier detection of large indels, while NGS showed better accuracy of variants identification and capability for detection of additional pathogenic variants in adjacent regions. A total of 23 variants had significant differences in estimated AF comparing with non-Finnish Europeans from gnomAD. This study provides new AF data for variants associated with the studied disorders and the comparison of genotyping methods for carrier screening.

Keywords