Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine (Oct 2022)

The addition of genetic testing and cardiovascular magnetic resonance to routine clinical data for stratification of etiology in dilated cardiomyopathy

  • Ravi J. Amin,
  • Ravi J. Amin,
  • Deborah Morris-Rosendahl,
  • Deborah Morris-Rosendahl,
  • Mat Edwards,
  • Upasana Tayal,
  • Upasana Tayal,
  • Upasana Tayal,
  • Rachel Buchan,
  • Daniel J. Hammersley,
  • Daniel J. Hammersley,
  • Richard E. Jones,
  • Richard E. Jones,
  • Sabiha Gati,
  • Sabiha Gati,
  • Sabiha Gati,
  • Zohya Khalique,
  • Zohya Khalique,
  • Zohya Khalique,
  • Batool Almogheer,
  • Batool Almogheer,
  • Dudley J. Pennell,
  • Dudley J. Pennell,
  • Arun John Baksi,
  • Arun John Baksi,
  • Arun John Baksi,
  • Antonis Pantazis,
  • Antonis Pantazis,
  • James S. Ware,
  • James S. Ware,
  • James S. Ware,
  • Sanjay K. Prasad,
  • Sanjay K. Prasad,
  • Sanjay K. Prasad,
  • Brian P. Halliday,
  • Brian P. Halliday,
  • Brian P. Halliday

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1017119
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundGuidelines recommend genetic testing and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) for the investigation of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). However, the incremental value is unclear. We assessed the impact of these investigations in determining etiology.MethodsSixty consecutive patients referred with DCM and recruited to our hospital biobank were selected. Six independent experts determined the etiology of each phenotype in a step-wise manner based on (1) routine clinical data, (2) clinical and genetic data and (3) clinical, genetic and CMR data. They indicated their confidence (1-3) in the classification and any changes to management at each step.ResultsSix physicians adjudicated 60 cases. The addition of genetics and CMR resulted in 57 (15.8%) and 26 (7.2%) changes in the classification of etiology, including an increased number of genetic diagnoses and a reduction in idiopathic diagnoses. Diagnostic confidence improved at each step (p < 0.0005). The number of diagnoses made with low confidence reduced from 105 (29.2%) with routine clinical data to 71 (19.7%) following the addition of genetics and 37 (10.3%) with the addition of CMR. The addition of genetics and CMR led to 101 (28.1%) and 112 (31.1%) proposed changes to management, respectively. Interobserver variability showed moderate agreement with clinical data (κ = 0.44) which improved following the addition of genetics (κ = 0.65) and CMR (κ = 0.68).ConclusionWe demonstrate that genetics and CMR, frequently changed the classification of etiology in DCM, improved confidence and interobserver variability in determining the diagnosis and had an impact on proposed management.

Keywords