E/e’ Ratio Predicts the Atrial Pacing-Induced Left Atrial Pressure Response in Patients with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Seung-Young Roh,
Dae-In Lee,
Kwang-No Lee,
Jinhee Ahn,
Yong-Soo Baek,
Dong-Hyeok Kim,
Jaemin Shim,
Jong-Il Choi,
Young-Hoon Kim
Affiliations
Seung-Young Roh
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine and Korea University Medical Center, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
Dae-In Lee
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungju-si 28644, Republic of Korea
Kwang-No Lee
Department of Cardiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon 16499, Republic of Korea
Jinhee Ahn
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Hsopital, Busan 49241, Republic of Korea
Yong-Soo Baek
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Incheon 22332, Republic of Korea
Dong-Hyeok Kim
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha University Hospital, Seoul 07804, Republic of Korea
Jaemin Shim
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine and Korea University Medical Center, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
Jong-Il Choi
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine and Korea University Medical Center, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
Young-Hoon Kim
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine and Korea University Medical Center, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea
Background and Objectives: Left atrial hypertension is one of the pathophysiologies of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. We hypothesized that left atrial pressure response (LAPR) to incremental pacing is higher in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and can predict left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. Materials and Methods: Patients requiring left atrial access as a part of a therapeutic procedure for AF (n = 204, AF group) or supraventricular tachycardia (n = 34, control group) were analyzed (male n = 183, 54 ± 12 years old). LAPR was measured during incremental pacing. Results: Baseline left atrial pressure and LAPR at all pacing rates were not different between the AF and control groups. They were higher in patients with a high E/e’ (≥ 8) than in those with a low E/e’ (p Conclusions: LAPR to incremental pacing was constant regardless of AF. The non-invasive echocardiographic marker E/e’ reflected pacing-induced left atrial hypertension.