Elderly Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Hypertension: Clinical Characteristics, Survival, and Risk Stratification in a Single-Center Prospective Registry
Natalia Goncharova,
Kirill Lapshin,
Aelita Berezina,
Maria Simakova,
Alexandr Marichev,
Irina Zlobina,
Narek Marukyan,
Kirill Malikov,
Alexandra Aseeva,
Vadim Zaitsev,
Olga Moiseeva
Affiliations
Natalia Goncharova
Almazov National Medical Research Centre, Ministry of Health of Russia, Saint Petersburg 197341, Russia
Kirill Lapshin
Almazov National Medical Research Centre, Ministry of Health of Russia, Saint Petersburg 197341, Russia
Aelita Berezina
Almazov National Medical Research Centre, Ministry of Health of Russia, Saint Petersburg 197341, Russia
Maria Simakova
Almazov National Medical Research Centre, Ministry of Health of Russia, Saint Petersburg 197341, Russia
Alexandr Marichev
Almazov National Medical Research Centre, Ministry of Health of Russia, Saint Petersburg 197341, Russia
Irina Zlobina
Almazov National Medical Research Centre, Ministry of Health of Russia, Saint Petersburg 197341, Russia
Narek Marukyan
Almazov National Medical Research Centre, Ministry of Health of Russia, Saint Petersburg 197341, Russia
Kirill Malikov
Almazov National Medical Research Centre, Ministry of Health of Russia, Saint Petersburg 197341, Russia
Alexandra Aseeva
Almazov National Medical Research Centre, Ministry of Health of Russia, Saint Petersburg 197341, Russia
Vadim Zaitsev
Almazov National Medical Research Centre, Ministry of Health of Russia, Saint Petersburg 197341, Russia
Olga Moiseeva
Almazov National Medical Research Centre, Ministry of Health of Russia, Saint Petersburg 197341, Russia
Introduction: The predictive value of the risk stratification scales in elderly patients with IPAH might differ from that in younger patients. It is unknown whether young and older IPAH patients have the same survival dependence on PAH-specific therapy numbers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic relevance of risk stratification scales and PAH medication numbers in elderly IPAH patients in comparison with young IPAH patients. Materials and methods: A total of 119 patients from a prospective single-center PAH registry were divided into group I p = 0.03; and in patients with LHD comorbidities in the entire cohort, it was AUC 0.73 (0.59–0.87), p p = 0.01, HR 0.2), the right-to-left ventricle dimension ratio (p = 0.0047, HR 5.97), and NT-proBNP > 1400 pg/mL (p = 0.008, HR 3.18). Conclusion: Risk stratification in the elderly IPAH patients requires a fundamentally different approach than that of younger patients, taking into account the initial limitations in physical performance and comorbidities that interfere with current assessment scores. The REVEAL score reliably stratifies patients at any age and LHD comorbidities. The initial monotherapy seems to be reasonable in patients over 60 years. Selection tools for initial combination PAH therapy in older IPAH patients with comorbidities need to be validated in prospective observational studies.