Frontiers in Neuroscience (Dec 2013)

Distinct effects of IPSU and suvorexant on mouse sleep architecture

  • Daniel eHoyer,
  • Daniel eHoyer,
  • Thomas eDürst,
  • Markus eFendt,
  • Markus eFendt,
  • Laura H Jacobson,
  • Laura H Jacobson,
  • Claudia eBetschart,
  • Samuel eHintermann,
  • Dirk eBehnke,
  • Simona eCotesta,
  • Grit eLaue,
  • Silvio eOfner,
  • Eric eLegangneux,
  • Christine E Gee,
  • Christine E Gee

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00235
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7

Abstract

Read online

Dual orexin receptor (OXR) antagonists (DORAs) such as almorexant, SB-649868, suvorexant (MK-4305) and filorexant (MK-6096), have shown promise for the treatment of insomnias and sleep disorders. Whether antagonism of both OX1R and OX2R is necessary for sleep induction has been a matter of some debate. Experiments using knockout mice suggest that it may be sufficient to antagonize only OX2R. The recent identification of an orally bioavailable, brain penetrant OX2R preferring antagonist 2-((1H-Indol-3-yl)methyl)-9-(4-methoxypyrimidin-2-yl)-2,9-diazaspiro[5.5]undecan-1-one (IPSU) has allowed us to test whether selective antagonism of OX2R may also be a viable strategy for induction of sleep. We previously demonstrated that IPSU and suvorexant increase sleep when dosed during the mouse active phase (lights off); IPSU inducing sleep primarily by increasing NREM sleep, suvorexant primarily by increasing REM sleep. Here, our goal was to determine whether suvorexant and IPSU affect sleep architecture independently of overall sleep induction. We therefore tested suvorexant (25 mg/kg) and IPSU (50 mg/kg) in mice during the inactive phase (lights on) when sleep is naturally more prevalent and when orexin levels are normally low. Whereas IPSU was devoid of effects on the time spent in NREM or REM, suvorexant substantially disturbed the sleep architecture by selectively increasing REM during the first 4 hours after dosing. At the doses tested, suvorexant significantly decreased wake only during the first hour and IPSU did not affect wake time. These data suggest that OX2R preferring antagonists may have a reduced tendency for perturbing NREM/REM architecture in comparison with DORAs. Whether this effect will prove to be a general feature of OX2R antagonists versus DORAs remains to be seen.

Keywords