OENO One (Nov 2022)

<i>Xiphinema index</i>-resistant grapevine materials derived from muscadine are also resistant to a population of <i>X. diversicaudatum</i>

  • Mohamed Youssef Banora,
  • Roger Voisin,
  • Van Chung Nguyen,
  • Ulysse Portier,
  • Carla Bernabo,
  • Cyril Van Ghelder,
  • Maria Das Dores Lafargue,
  • Jean-Pascal Tandonnet,
  • Gérard Demangeat,
  • Nathalie Ollat,
  • Daniel Esmenjaud

DOI
https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2022.56.4.5489
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 56, no. 4

Abstract

Read online

Grapevine is severely affected by two major nepoviruses that cause grapevine degeneration: the grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV) and the arabis mosaic virus (ArMV), specifically transmitted by the dagger nematodes Xiphinema index and X. diversicaudatum, respectively. While natural resistance to X. index has been shown to be a promising alternative for controlling X. index and GFLV transmission, the resistance interaction between X. diversicaudatum and grapevine has not yet been documented. In the present study, we evaluated the host suitability to X. diversicaudatum in materials previously characterised for their resistance to X. index. Two X. index-resistant accessions VRH8771 (F1 hybrid) and Nemadex Alain Bouquet (BC1 hybrid) derived from muscadine, together with the X. index-susceptible reference accession V. vinifera cv. Cabernet-Sauvignon and the X. index-resistant reference accession V. riparia ‘10128’, were challenged with a X. diversicaudatum population obtained from woody host plants and a reference isolate of X. index. The reproduction factors of X. diversicaudatum and its numbers per gram of roots paralleled those of X. index, showing a resistance interaction to the population of the former species and suggesting that resistance determinants to both nematode vectors might be the same or linked. Nevertheless, these two criteria illustrated a poorer host suitability of grapevine materials to this X. diversicaudatum population than to X. index.

Keywords