Pterygium surgery using inferior rotational conjunctival autograft versus conventional conjunctival autograft with sutures – A comparative study

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the outcomes of pterygium surgery by using an inferior rotational autograft and a conventional superior conjunctival autograft. Methods: This was a prospective interventional comparative study of 85 eyes of patients who were divided into two groups of 45 and 40. Standard techniques of both procedures were performed by a single surgeon. Astigmatism, recurrence rates, time taken, and other complications were compared. Results: All the subjects were in the age group 53 ± 7.56 (40–74) years. Demographic data and type of pterygium were comparable in the two groups. In the rotational group, the preoperative astigmatism was − 2.14 ± 1.36 D, which decreased in 1 week to 1.42 ± 1.11 D, in 1 month to − 1.13 ± 0.99 D, in 3 months to 0.91 ± 0.72 D, and in 6 months to 0.81 ± 0.85 D (P < 0.05 each). Preoperative astigmatism in the conventional group was − 2.63 ± 1.47 D, which decreased to − 1.43 ± 1.04 D in 1 week, −1.18 ± 0.85 D in 1 month, −1.07 ± 0.81 D in 3 months, and − 1.01 ± 0.78 D in 6 months (P < 0.05 each). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of astigmatism at any follow-up visit (P < 0.05). Complications like dellen, graft edema, and superficial vascularization were seen in both groups. The rotational group had one recurrence (2.86%). No recurrence was noted in the conventional group. None of the complication rates was significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Inferior rotational conjunctival autografting is a good technique for management of pterygium. It has a profile similar to that of conventional conjunctival autograft.

Keywords

• astigmatism
• autograft
• inferior
• pterygium surgery
• recurrence
• rotational