Frontiers in Public Health (Aug 2023)

A pragmatic clinical effectiveness trial of a novel alternative to punishment for school-based substance use infractions: study protocol for the iDECIDE curriculum

  • Caroline A. Gray,
  • Vanessa Iroegbulem,
  • Brooklyn Deming,
  • Rebecca Butler,
  • Dan Howell,
  • Michael P. Pascale,
  • Alec Bodolay,
  • Kevin Potter,
  • Amy Turncliff,
  • Stacey Lynch,
  • Jennie Whittaker,
  • Julia Ward,
  • Devin Maximus,
  • Gladys N. Pachas,
  • Gladys N. Pachas,
  • Randi M. Schuster,
  • Randi M. Schuster

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1203558
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundAdolescents who use alcohol and other drugs on school campuses are at heightened risk for adverse consequences to their health and wellbeing. Schools have historically turned to punitive approaches as a first-line response to substance use. However, punishment is an ineffective deterrent for substance use and may cause harm and increase inequities. iDECIDE (Drug Education Curriculum: Intervention, Diversion, and Empowerment) was developed as a scalable and youth-centered drug education and diversion program that can be used as a skills-based alternative to punishment. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of the iDECIDE curriculum as an alternative to punishment (ATP) for school-based substance use infractions in the context of a large pragmatic clinical effectiveness study.MethodsWe will conduct a Type 1, hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial. Using a stepped wedge design with approximately 90 middle and high schools in Massachusetts, we will randomly allocate the timing of implementation of the iDECIDE curriculum compared to standard disciplinary response over approximately 36 months. We will test the overarching hypothesis that student-level outcomes (knowledge of drug effects and attitudes about substance use; frequency of substance use; school connectedness) improve over time as schools transition from a standard disciplinary response to having access to iDECIDE. The secondary aims of this trial are to (1) explore whether change in student-level outcomes vary according to baseline substance use, number of peers who use alcohol or other drugs, age, gender, and school urbanicity, and (2) determine the acceptability and feasibility of the iDECIDE curriculum through qualitative stakeholder interviews.DiscussionSubstance use continues to be a major and rapidly evolving problem in schools. The importance of moving away from punishment to more restorative approaches is widely accepted; however, scalable alternatives have not yet been identified. This will be the first study to our knowledge to systematically evaluate an ATP for students who violate the school substance use policy and is well poised to have important implications for policy making.

Keywords