BMJ Open (May 2024)

Comprehensive observational study evaluating the enduring effectiveness of 4CMenB, the meningococcal B vaccine against gonococcal infections in the Northern Territory and South Australia, Australia: study protocol

  • Helen Marshall,
  • Jonathan Karnon,
  • James Ward,
  • Mark McMillan,
  • Andrew Lawrence,
  • Bing Wang,
  • Vicki Krause,
  • David M Whiley,
  • Rob Baird,
  • Charlotte Bell,
  • Monica M Lahra,
  • Manoji Gunathilake,
  • Louise Flood,
  • Prabha Andraweera,
  • Jana Sisnowski,
  • Rosalind Webby,
  • Emma Childs,
  • Natasha Egoroff,
  • Lex Leong,
  • Kevin Freeman,
  • Dimitrios Menouhos,
  • Sebastian van Hal

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079144
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 5

Abstract

Read online

Introduction The effectiveness of antibiotics for treating gonococcal infections is compromised due to escalating antibiotic resistance; and the development of an effective gonococcal vaccine has been challenging. Emerging evidence suggests that the licensed meningococcal B (MenB) vaccine, 4CMenB is effective against gonococcal infections due to cross-reacting antibodies and 95% genetic homology between the two bacteria, Neisseria meningitidis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, that cause the diseases. This project aims to undertake epidemiological and genomic surveillance to evaluate the long-term protection of the 4CMenB vaccine against gonococcal infections in the Northern Territory (NT) and South Australia (SA), and to determine the potential benefit of a booster vaccine doses to provide longer-term protection against gonococcal infections.Methods and analyses This observational study will provide long-term evaluation results of the effectiveness of the 4CMenB vaccine against gonococcal infections at 4–7 years post 4CMenB programme implementation. Routine notifiable disease notifications will be the basis for assessing the impact of the vaccine on gonococcal infections. Pathology laboratories will provide data on the number and percentage of N. gonorrhoeae positive tests relative to all tests administered and will coordinate molecular sequencing for isolates. Genome sequencing results will be provided by SA Pathology and Territory Pathology/New South Wales Health Pathology, and linked with notification data by SA Health and NT Health. There are limitations in observational studies including the potential for confounding. Confounders will be analysed separately for each outcome/comparison.Ethics and dissemination The protocol and all study documents have been reviewed and approved by the SA Department for Health and Well-being Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/2022/HRE00308), and the evaluation will commence in the NT on receipt of approval from the NT Health and Menzies School of Health Research Human Research Ethics Committee. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific meetings and public forums.