BMC Health Services Research (Jul 2022)

Global core indicators for measuring WHO’s paediatric quality-of-care standards in health facilities: development and expert consensus

  • Moise Muzigaba,
  • Tamar Chitashvili,
  • Allysha Choudhury,
  • Wilson M. Were,
  • Theresa Diaz,
  • Kathleen L. Strong,
  • Debra Jackson,
  • Jennifer Requejo,
  • Anne Detjen,
  • Emma Sacks

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08234-5
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 22, no. 1
pp. 1 – 19

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background There are currently no global recommendations on a parsimonious and robust set of indicators that can be measured routinely or periodically to monitor quality of hospital care for children and young adolescents. We describe a systematic methodology used to prioritize and define a core set of such indicators and their metadata for progress tracking, accountability, learning and improvement, at facility, (sub) national, national, and global levels. Methods We used a deductive methodology which involved the use of the World Health Organization Standards for improving the quality-of-care for children and young adolescents in health facilities as the organizing framework for indicator development. The entire process involved 9 complementary steps which included: a rapid literature review of available evidence, the application of a peer-reviewed systematic algorithm for indicator systematization and prioritization, and multiple iterative expert consultations to establish consensus on the proposed indicators and their metadata. Results We derived a robust set of 25 core indicators and their metadata, representing all 8 World Health Organization quality standards, 40 quality statements and 520 quality measures. Most of these indicators are process-related (64%) and 20% are outcome/impact indicators. A large proportion (84%) of indicators were proposed for measurement at both outpatient and inpatient levels. By virtue of being a parsimonious set and given the stringent criteria for prioritizing indicators with “quality measurement” attributes, the recommended set is not evenly distributed across the 8 quality standards. Conclusions To support ongoing global and national initiatives around paediatric quality-of-care programming at country level, the recommended indicators can be adopted using a tiered approach that considers indicator measurability in the short-, medium-, and long-terms, within the context of the country’s health information system readiness and maturity. However, there is a need for further research to assess the feasibility of implementing these indicators across contexts, and the need for their validation for global common reporting.

Keywords