PLoS ONE (Jan 2016)

No Evidence for Disease History as a Risk Factor for Narcolepsy after A(H1N1)pdm09 Vaccination.

  • Favelle Lamb,
  • Alexander Ploner,
  • Katharina Fink,
  • Markus Maeurer,
  • Peter Bergman,
  • Fredrik Piehl,
  • Daniel Weibel,
  • Pär Sparén,
  • Lisen Arnheim Dahlström

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154296
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 4
p. e0154296

Abstract

Read online

OBJECTIVES:To investigate disease history before A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccination as a risk factor for narcolepsy. METHODS:Case-control study in Sweden. Cases included persons referred for a Multiple Sleep Latency Test between 2009 and 2010, identified through diagnostic sleep centres and confirmed through independent review of medical charts. Controls, selected from the total population register, were matched to cases on age, gender, MSLT-referral date and county of residence. Disease history (prescriptions and diagnoses) and vaccination history was collected through telephone interviews and population-based healthcare registers. Conditional logistic regression was used to investigate disease history before A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccination as a risk-factor for narcolepsy. RESULTS:In total, 72 narcolepsy cases and 251 controls were included (range 3-69 years mean19-years). Risk of narcolepsy was increased in individuals with a disease history of nervous system disorders (OR range = 3.6-8.8) and mental and behavioural disorders (OR = 3.8, 95% CI 1.6-8.8) before referral. In a second analysis of vaccinated individuals only, nearly all initial associations were no longer statistically significant and effect sizes were smaller (OR range = 1.3-2.6). A significant effect for antibiotics (OR = 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.8) and a marginally significant effect for nervous system disorders was observed. In a third case-only analysis, comparing cases referred before vaccination to those referred after; prescriptions for nervous system disorders (OR = 26.0 95% CI 4.0-170.2) and ADHD (OR = 35.3 95% CI 3.4-369.9) were statistically significant during the vaccination period, suggesting initial associations were due to confounding by indication. CONCLUSION:The findings of this study do not support disease history before A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccination as a risk factor for narcolepsy.