Journal of Clinical Medicine (Nov 2020)

Circulating Tumor DNA as a Prognostic Determinant in Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Atezolizumab

  • Guillaume Herbreteau,
  • Alexandra Langlais,
  • Laurent Greillier,
  • Clarisse Audigier-Valette,
  • Lionel Uwer,
  • José Hureaux,
  • Denis Moro-Sibilot,
  • Florian Guisier,
  • Delphine Carmier,
  • Jeannick Madelaine,
  • Josiane Otto,
  • Pierre-Jean Souquet,
  • Valérie Gounant,
  • Patrick Merle,
  • Olivier Molinier,
  • Aldo Renault,
  • Audrey Rabeau,
  • Franck Morin,
  • Marc G Denis,
  • Jean-Louis Pujol

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9123861
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 12
p. 3861

Abstract

Read online

Background: The IFCT-1603 trial evaluated atezolizumab in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). The purpose of the present study was to determine whether circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), prospectively collected at treatment initiation, was associated with the prognosis of SCLC, and whether it identified patients who benefited from atezolizumab. Methods: 68 patients were included in this study: 46 patients were treated with atezolizumab and 22 with conventional chemotherapy. Circulating DNA was extracted from plasma and NGS (Next Generation Sequencing) looked for mutations in the TP53, RB1, NOTCH1, NOTCH2, and NOTCH3 genes. ctDNA was detectable when at least one somatic mutation was identified, and its relative abundance was quantified by the variant allele fraction (VAF) of the most represented mutation. Results: We found that 49/68 patients (70.6%) had detectable baseline ctDNA. The most frequently identified mutations were TP53 (32/49; 65.3%) and RB1 (25/49; 51.0%). Patients with detectable ctDNA had a significantly lower disease control rate at week 6 compared with patients with no detectable ctDNA, regardless of the nature of the treatment. Detection of ctDNA was associated with a poor OS prognosis. The detection of ctDNA at a relative abundance greater than the median value was significantly associated with poor overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Interestingly, the benefit in overall survival (OS) associated with low ctDNA was more pronounced in patients treated with atezolizumab than in patients receiving chemotherapy. Among patients whose relative ctDNA abundance was below the median, those treated with atezolizumab tended to have higher OS than those in the chemotherapy arm. Conclusion: ctDNA is strongly associated with the prognosis of SCLC patients treated with second-line immunotherapy. Its analysis seems justified for future SCLC clinical trials.

Keywords