Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics (Sep 2018)
Floating toe
Abstract
Category: Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: The Weil osteotomy (WO) is frequently used for treating metatarsalgia and metatarsophalangeal (MTP) instability. Nevertheless, it presents complications, being the floating toe the most frequent one. A modification has been proposed to decrease the beforementioned complication, removing a slice from the osteotomy (modified Weil osteotomy, MWO). Additionally, it has been proposed that stabilizing the toe interphalangeal joints when treating hammer toes may contribute to decrease the floating toe complication, given that all flexors contribute to MTP flexion. The objective of this research is to describe complications and functional score in patients operated with MWO with and without interphalangeal stabilization. Methods: 110 patients (250 toes) treated for metatarsalgia and hammer toe deformity were retrospectively collected and prospectively followed for 66 months (SD 15). 2 groups were studied, 45 adults with isolated MWO and 65 adults with MWO with toe stabilization. Average age 55. Patients with Diabetes, previous surgeries and infections were excluded. LEFS, AOFAS and satisfaction index were recorded. A physical examination looking for floating toe, MTP instability and metatarsalgia was performed. Statistical analysis included logistic regression spearmen correlation test, Mann-Whitney test and student T test. Results: LEFS and AOFAS scores were 70 and 73 respectively, with no differences between patients operated with isolated MWO or with toe stabilization. Satisfaction index average result was “minor reservations”. Floating toe incidence was 24%, with no difference between groups. There was no difference in functional scores and satisfaction index if floating toe was present or absent. There was no correlation between functional scores and satisfaction index. Metatarsalgia was present in 31% of patients, and there is a direct correlation of floating toe occurrence and pain (4 times more chance to have pain). Conclusion: There was no clinical significant consequence of floating toe on LEFS, AOFAS or satisfaction. There was no difference in complication rate, functional scores and patient satisfaction if the interphalangeal joint was fixed or not. Although floating toe didn’t influence on functional scores, it was associated with pain. It can be suggested that the scores utilized were not able to detect the negative influence of floating toe on every patient. The high prevalence of floating toe using the MWO should make us look for additional factors which we may be overlooking when treating metatarsalgia, such as plantar plate damage.