Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Jul 2004)

Significado clínico das dissecções coronarianas não complicadas após o implante de "stents" Clinical meaning of uncomplicated coronary dissections after stent implantation

  • Alexandre Schaan de Quadros,
  • Carlos A. M. Gottschall,
  • Rogério Sarmento-Leite,
  • Lenise Valler,
  • André Bussmann

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0066-782X2004001300002
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 83, no. 1
pp. 4 – 10

Abstract

Read online

OBJETIVO: Analisar a influência de dissecções coronarianas não complicadas na incidência de revascularização do vaso alvo e eventos cardiovasculares maiores, em um ano. MÉTODO: Pacientes tratados de junho/1996 a dezembro/2000, sendo os dados coletados, prospectivamente, e comparadas dissecções não complicadas (G1, n=36) às sem dissecções (G2, n=871). Os dados foram analisados com programa estatístico SPSS 8,0, os desfechos comparados com curvas de Kaplan-Meier e o nível de significância avaliado pelo teste do log rank. RESULTADOS: As características clínicas foram semelhantes nos dois grupos: O G1 apresentou diâmetro de referência médio menor (pOBJECTIVE: To assess the influence of uncomplicated coronary dissections in the incidence of target vessel revascularization and cardiovascular events after 1 year. METHODS: Patients treated from June 1996 to December 2000, with data prospectively collected and uncomplicated dissections (G1, n=36), were compared with those patients without dissections (G2, n=871). Data were assessed with SPSS 8.0 statistical software, the outcomes were compared with the Kaplan-Meier curve, and the significance level was assessed using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Clinical features were similar in both groups: G1 had lower mean reference diameters (P<0.0001), a greater number of patients with type C lesions (P=0.01), a lower final lumen diameter at the end of the procedure (P=0.003), and a greater balloon/artery ratio (P<0.0001). In the multivariate analysis, only the reference diameter and the artery/balloon ratio were independently associated with the presence of residual dissections. No statistically significant difference existed in the incidence of revascularization of the target vessel and major cardiovascular events, at 1-year clinical follow-up, between the 2 groups of patients. Predictors of adverse clinical events at 1 year were the reference diameter, lesion extension, and residual stenosis, rather than the presence of residual dissection. CONCLUSION: Uncomplicated residual dissections after coronary stents are associated with narrower vessels and a higher balloon/artery ratio. Residual dissections are not associated with worse outcomes at 1-year clinical follow-up.

Keywords