World Journal of Surgical Oncology (Aug 2018)

Prospective comparison of various radiological response criteria and pathological response to preoperative chemotherapy and survival in operable high-grade soft tissue sarcomas in the Japan Clinical Oncology Group study JCOG0304

  • Kazuhiro Tanaka,
  • Gakuto Ogawa,
  • Junki Mizusawa,
  • Norifumi Naka,
  • Akira Kawai,
  • Mitsuru Takahashi,
  • Toru Hiruma,
  • Yoshihiro Matsumoto,
  • Hiroyuki Tsuchiya,
  • Robert Nakayama,
  • Hiroshi Hatano,
  • Makoto Emori,
  • Masami Hosaka,
  • Yukihiro Yoshida,
  • Junya Toguchida,
  • Satoshi Abe,
  • Kunihiro Asanuma,
  • Ryohei Yokoyama,
  • Hiroaki Hiraga,
  • Tsukasa Yonemoto,
  • Takeshi Morii,
  • Seiichi Matsumoto,
  • Akihito Nagano,
  • Hideki Yoshikawa,
  • Haruhiko Fukuda,
  • Toshifumi Ozaki,
  • Yukihide Iwamoto

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-018-1462-y
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 1
pp. 1 – 8

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare malignant tumors. The efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy for STS is evaluated using various tumor size-based radiological response criteria. However, it is still unclear which set of criteria would show the best association with pathological response and survival of the patients with STS. Methods We compared radiological responses to preoperative chemotherapy for operable STS by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), modified RECIST, World Health Organization criteria, Japanese Orthopaedic Association criteria, and modified Choi criteria and analyzed the association with pathological response and survival using the data from the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) study JCOG0304, a phase II clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of perioperative chemotherapy for STS in the extremities. Results Seventy eligible patients in JCOG0304 were analyzed. The results demonstrated that none of the size-based radiological response criteria showed significant association with pathological response to preoperative chemotherapy for STS. The difference between overall survival of the patients assessed as partial response and stable disease/progressive disease by RECIST was not significant (hazard ratio 1.37, p = 0.63), and calculated C-index was 0.50. All other response criteria also could not exhibit significant association between radiological responses and survival. Conclusion In the present study, none of the radiological response criteria analyzed demonstrated association of response to preoperative chemotherapy with pathological response or survival of the patients with operable STS. Further prospective investigation is required to develop criteria to evaluate not only tumor shrinkage but biological effects of preoperative chemotherapy for the patients with localized STS. Trial registration UMIN Clinical Trials Registry C000000096. Registered 30 August, 2005 (retrospectively registered).

Keywords