Practical Laboratory Medicine (Mar 2024)

Comparison of plasma aldosterone measured by chemiluminescence immunoassay and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in screening test for primary aldosteronism

  • Wenzhan Chen,
  • Fenghua Lai,
  • Xiaoyu Huang,
  • Shuang Yu,
  • Nan Chen,
  • Changliu Xu,
  • Chenxue Wang,
  • Shuhui Liang,
  • Yanbing Li,
  • Haipeng Xiao,
  • Xiaopei Cao

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 39
p. e00361

Abstract

Read online

Background: Whether chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) measurement can be used interchangeably in primary aldosteronism (PA) screening is still controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare CLIA to LC-MS/MS for PAC measurement in PA screening. Methods: All participants underwent aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) testing. PA was diagnosed by captopril challenge test or saline infusion test. PAC in screening test was measured with CLIA and LC-MS/MS. Plasma direct renin concentration in screening and confirmatory test was measured with CLIA. The concordance between CLIA and LC-MS/MS for PAC measurement in PA screening was analyzed. Results: Twenty-one healthy volunteers, 61 patients with essential hypertension (EH) and 43 PA patients were enrolled. Median PAC by CLIA was 84.7 % higher than that by LC-MS/MS in screening test (P < 0.001). A positive correlation of PAC was observed between the two assays (Pearson r coefficient 0.770, P < 0.001). When ARR was used in differentiating PA from EH, there was no difference in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve between CLIA and LC-MS/MS for PAC measurement (0.968 vs 0.950, P = 0.249). Conclusion: CLIA and LC-MS/MS for PAC measurement exhibited high and comparable efficacy in PA screening. CLIA is a reliable and feasible alternative in PA screening test.

Keywords