Remote Sensing (Jun 2024)

Massive Sea-Level-Driven Marsh Migration and Implications for Coastal Resilience along the Texas Coast

  • Nathalie W. Jung,
  • Thomas A. Doe,
  • Yoonho Jung,
  • Timothy M. Dellapenna

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16132268
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 13
p. 2268

Abstract

Read online

Tidal salt marshes offer crucial ecosystem services in the form of carbon sequestration, fisheries, property and recreational values, and protection from storm surges, and are therefore considered one of the most valuable and fragile ecosystems worldwide, where sea-level rise and direct human modifications resulted in the loss of vast regions of today’s marshland. The extent of salt marshes therefore relies heavily on the interplay between upland migration and edge erosion. We measured changes in marsh size based on historical topographic sheets from the 1850s and 2019 satellite imagery along the Texas coast, which is home to three of the largest estuaries in North America (e.g., Galveston, Corpus Christi, and Matagorda Bays). We further distinguished between changes in high and low marsh based on local elevation data in an effort to estimate changes in local ecosystem services. Our results showed that approximately 410 km2 (58%) of salt marshes were lost due to coastal erosion and marsh ponding and nearly 510 km2 (72%) of salt marshes were created, likely due to upland submergence. Statistical analyses showed a significant relationship between marsh migration and upland slope, suggesting that today’s marshland formed as a result of submergence of barren uplands along gently sloping coastal plains. Although the overall areal extent of Texas marshes increased throughout the last century (~100 km2 or 14%), economic gains through upland migration of high marshes (mostly in the form of property value (USD 0.7–1.0 trillion)) were too small to offset sea-level-driven losses of crucial ecosystem services of Texan low marshes (in the form of storm protection and fisheries (USD 2.1–2.7 trillion)). Together, our results suggest that despite significant increases in marsh area, the loss of crucial ecosystem services underscores the complexity and importance of considering not only quantity but also quality in marshland conservation efforts.

Keywords