Journal of Inflammation Research (Aug 2024)
Prognostic Value of Anti-Chlamydia Trachomatis IgG in Breast Cancer and the Modification Effects of Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines: A 13-Year Prospective Cohort Study
Abstract
Na Li,1,* Yue-xiang Ren,2,* Heng-ming Ye,1,3 Ying Lin,4 Qiang Liu,5 Jiao Wang,1 Ze-fang Ren,1 Lin Xu1,6,7 1The School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China; 2The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China; 3Public Health Service Center of Bao’an District, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China; 4The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China; 5Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China; 6School of Public Health, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; 7Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Ze-fang Ren; Lin Xu, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, 74 Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, 510080, People’s Republic of China, Tel +0086-20-87332577 ; Tel +0086-20- 87335523, Fax +011-86-20-87332577, Email [email protected]; [email protected]: Chlamydia trachomatis (C. trachomatis) is associated with several gynecological tumors; yet its prognostic role in breast cancer remains unclear. Thus, we investigated the prognostic role of anti-C. trachomatis immunoglobulin G (IgG) in breast cancer patients and the modification effects of pro-inflammatory cytokines.Methods: The serum levels of C. trachomatis IgG and four pro-inflammatory cytokines were measured. Cox regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), including product terms to assess the modification effects of pro-inflammatory cytokines on the association between C. trachomatis IgG and breast cancer prognosis.Results: From 2008 to 2018, 1121 breast cancer patients were recruited and followed up until December 31, 2021, with a median follow-up time of 63.91 months (interquartile range: 39.16– 90.08 months). Patients positive for C. trachomatis IgG showed HRs of 1.09 (95% CI, 0.67– 1.78) for overall survival (OS) and 1.24 (0.87– 1.78) for progression-free survival (PFS), compared to those who were negative. These associations became statistically significant in women aged 50 years or younger (HR=1.43, 95% CI=0.79– 2.58 for OS; HR=1.79, 95% CI=1.16– 2.77 for PFS). Positive C. trachomatis IgG serology was associated with adverse prognostic effects among patients with higher levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α, IL-8, and IL-1β), but with favorable prognostic effects for those with low levels. These interactions were particularly significant in those aged 50 years or younger.Conclusion: In breast cancer patients younger than 50 years of age or with higher levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, C. trachomatis infection appeared to have a negative prognostic impact. These findings highlight the significance of C. trachomatis in predicting prognosis and personalized therapy for breast cancer patients.Keywords: Chlamydia trachomatis, breast cancer, prognosis, pro-inflammatory cytokines