Endocrine Connections (Jun 2020)

Post first-line dacarbazine or temozolomide in neuroendocrine carcinoma

  • Thomas Couronne,
  • Paul Girot,
  • Julien Hadoux,
  • Thierry Lecomte,
  • Alice Durand,
  • Caroline Fine,
  • Katia Vandevoorde,
  • Catherine Lombard-Bohas,
  • Thomas Walter

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1530/EC-20-0192
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 6
pp. 498 – 505

Abstract

Read online

Objective: First-line chemotherapy in metastatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) is based on etoposide and platinum. However, there is no standard concerning second-line treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate effic acy and tolerance of dacarbazine or temozolomide in metastatic digestive NEC as post first-line treatment. Material and methods: This study included patients with a metastatic NEC of digestive or unknown primary site. All patients received platinum-etoposi de as first-line chemotherapy. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were clinical/morphological responses, toxicity, and overall survival (OS). Results: Twenty-seven patients were included: 17 received dacarbazine and 10 temozolomide as post-first line treatments. Median PFS was 3.0 ( 95%CI (2.2;3.7)) months. There was no significant difference between dacarbazine and temoz olomide on PFS. Clinical and morphological responses were found in 12 and 9 pat ients, respectively. Median OS was 7.2 (95%CI (2.2;12.2)) months. The toxicity profil e was that expected with such treatments. Conclusion: LV5FU2-dacarbazine or temozolomide-capecitabine chemotherapies allow a temporary clinical response for almost half of patients and/or a morphological response for a third of patients.

Keywords