Conservation Science and Practice (Aug 2024)

Tracking species recovery status to improve U.S. endangered species act decisions

  • Olivia N. Davis,
  • Brenda Molano‐Flores,
  • Ya‐Wei Li,
  • Maximilian L. Allen,
  • Mark A. Davis,
  • Jean M. Mengelkoch,
  • Joseph J. Parkos III,
  • Anthony Paul Porreca,
  • Auriel M. V. Fournier,
  • Jeremy Tiemann,
  • Jason Bried,
  • Paul B. Marcum,
  • Connie J. Carroll‐Cunningham,
  • Eric D. Janssen,
  • Eric F. Ulaszek,
  • Susan McIntyre,
  • Edward P. F. Price,
  • Julie Nieset,
  • Tara Beveroth,
  • Alexander Di Giovanni,
  • Ryan J. Askren,
  • Luke J. Malanchuk,
  • Jared F. Duquette,
  • Michael J. Dreslik,
  • Thomas C. McElrath,
  • Kirk Stodola,
  • Jacob Malcom,
  • Andrew Carter,
  • Megan Evansen,
  • Leah R. Gerber

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.13159
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6, no. 8
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Currently 1677 species are listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA), yet only a small percentage have been delisted due to recovery. In the fall of 2021, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service proposed delisting 23 species due to extinction. Tracking changes in species ‘recovery status over time is critical to understanding species’ statuses, informing adaptive management strategies, and assessing the performance of the ESA to prevent further species loss. In this paper, we describe four key obstacles in tracking species recovery status under the ESA. First, ESA 5‐year reviews lack a standardized format and clear documentation. Second, despite having been listed for decades, many species still suffer major data gaps in their biology and threats, rendering it difficult if not impossible to track progress towards recovery. Third, many species have continued declining after listing, yet given the above (1 & 2), understanding potential causes (proximate and/or ultimate) can be difficult. Fourth, many species currently have no path to clear recovery, which represents a potential failing of the process. We conclude with a discussion of potential policy responses that could be addressed to enhance the efficacy of the ESA.

Keywords