BMC Ophthalmology (Jan 2025)

Intraocular lens calculation formula selection for short eyes: based on axial length and anterior chamber depth

  • Ruoxi Gao,
  • Jiaqing Zhang,
  • Xiaotong Han,
  • Yiguo Huang,
  • Ruoxuan Huang,
  • Jinfeng Ye,
  • Ling Wen,
  • Xiaozhang Qiu,
  • Xiaoyun Chen,
  • Xuhua Tan,
  • Lixia Luo

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-024-03793-z
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 25, no. 1
pp. 1 – 9

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the predictive accuracy of 11 intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas in eyes with an axial length (AL) less than 22.00 mm. Methods New-generation formulas (Barrett Universal II [BUII], Emmetropia Verifying Optical [EVO] 2.0, Hill-Radial Basis Function [Hill-RBF] 3.0, Hoffer QST, K6, Kane, Pearl-DGS) and traditional formulas (Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1 and SRK/T) were evaluated for predictive accuracy. Subgroup analyses were performed based on AL and anterior chamber depth (ACD). Results The study enrolled a total of 184 eyes from 184 patients. The BUII, Hoffer QST, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRK/T showed myopic shifts (-0.49 to -0.18 diopters [D], P 2.5 mm, the Pearl-DGS displayed the smallest MAE (0.43 D) and lowest RMSAE (0.57 D), while other new-generation formulas showed relatively worse performance (MAE: 0.46 to 0.67 D; RMSAE: 0.60 to 0.84 D). Conclusion The Kane formula showed the highest accuracy in short eyes, whereas the Pearl-DGS had superior performance in eyes with a relatively shorter AL and deeper ACD. Clinical trial number Not applicable.

Keywords