International Journal of Neonatal Screening (Mar 2024)

Retrospective Review of Positive Newborn Screening Results for Isovaleric Acidemia and Development of a Strategy to Improve the Efficacy of Newborn Screening in the UK

  • Rachel S. Carling,
  • Katy Hedgethorne,
  • Anupam Chakrapani,
  • Patricia L. Hall,
  • Nick Flynn,
  • Toby Greenfield,
  • Stuart J. Moat,
  • Joshua Ssali,
  • Lynette Shakespeare,
  • Nazia Taj,
  • Teresa H. Y. Wu,
  • Mark Anderson,
  • Arunabha Ghosh,
  • Hugh Lemonde,
  • Germaine Pierre,
  • Mark Sharrard,
  • Sreevidya Sreekantam,
  • James R. Bonham

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns10010024
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 1
p. 24

Abstract

Read online

Since the UK commenced newborn screening for isovaleric acidemia in 2015, changes in prescribing have increased the incidence of false positive (FP) results due to pivaloylcarnitine. A review of screening results between 2015 and 2022 identified 24 true positive (TP) and 84 FP cases, with pivalate interference confirmed in 76/84. Initial C5 carnitine (C5C) did not discriminate between FP and TP with median (range) C5C of 2.9 (2.0–9.6) and 4.0 (1.8–>70) µmol/L, respectively, and neither did Precision Newborn Screening via Collaborative Laboratory Integrated Reports (CLIR), which identified only 1/47 FP cases. However, among the TP cases, disease severity showed a correlation with initial C5C in ‘asymptomatic’ individuals (n = 17), demonstrating a median (range) C5C of 3.0 (1.8–7.1) whilst ‘clinically affected’ patients (n = 7), showed a median (range) C5C of 13.9 (7.7–70) µmol/L. These findings allowed the introduction of dual cut-off values into the screening algorithm to reduce the incidence of FPs, with initial C5C results ≥ 5 µmol/L triggering urgent referral, and those >2.0 and <5.0 µmol/L prompting second-tier C5-isobar testing. This will avoid delayed referral in babies at particular risk whilst reducing the FP rate for the remainder.

Keywords