Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment (Jan 2024)

Analysis of Individualized Silicone Rubber Bolus Using Fan Beam Computed Tomography in Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: A Dosimetric Evaluation and Skin Acute Radiation Dermatitis Survey

  • Xue-mei Chen MS,
  • Chen-di Xu MS,
  • Li-ping Zeng BS,
  • Xiao-tong Huang BS,
  • Ao-qiang Chen BS,
  • Lu Liu MS,
  • Liu-wen Lin BS,
  • Le-cheng Jia PhD,
  • Hua Li PhD,
  • Xiao-bo Jiang BS

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15330338241229367
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 23

Abstract

Read online

Objective: To investigate the dosimetric effects of using individualized silicone rubber (SR) bolus on the target area and organs at risk (OARs) during postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT), as well as evaluate skin acute radiation dermatitis (ARD). Methods: A retrospective study was performed on 30 patients with breast cancer. Each patient was prepared with an individualized SR bolus of 3 mm thickness. Fan-beam computed tomography (FBCT) was performed at the first and second fractions, and then once a week for a total of 5 times. Dosimetric metrics such as homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), skin dose (SD), and OARs including the heart, lungs, and spinal cord were compared between the original plan and the FBCTs. The acute side effects were recorded. Results: In targets' dosimetric metrics, there were no significant differences in D mean and V 105% between planning computed tomography (CT) and actual treatments ( P > .05), while the differences in D 95% , V 95% , HI, and CI were statistically significant ( P .05) except the V 30 of affected lung, which was slightly lower than the planning CT ( P < .05). In SD, both D max and D mean in actual treatments were increased than plan A, and the difference was statistically significant ( P < .05), while the skin-V 20 and skin-V 30 has no difference. Among the 30 patients, only one patient had no skin ARD, and 5 patients developed ARD of grade 2, while the remaining 24 patients were grade 1. Conclusion: The OR bolus showed good anastomoses and high interfraction reproducibility with the chest wall, and did not cause deformation during irradiation. It ensured accurate dose delivery of the target and OARs during the treatment, which may increase SD by over 101%. In this study, no cases of grade 3 skin ARD were observed. However, the potential of using OR bolus to reduce grade 1 and 2 skin ARD warrants further investigation with a larger sample size.