PLoS ONE (Jan 2020)

Prevalence of iron deficiency in 62,685 women of seven race/ethnicity groups: The HEIRS Study.

  • James C Barton,
  • Howard H Wiener,
  • Ronald T Acton,
  • Paul C Adams,
  • John H Eckfeldt,
  • Victor R Gordeuk,
  • Emily L Harris,
  • Christine E McLaren,
  • Helen Harrison,
  • Gordon D McLaren,
  • David M Reboussin

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232125
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 4
p. e0232125

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundFew cross-sectional studies report iron deficiency (ID) prevalence in women of different race/ethnicity and ages in US or Canada.Materials and methodsWe evaluated screening observations on women who participated between 2001-2003 in a cross-sectional, primary care-based sample of adults ages ≥25 y whose observations were complete: race/ethnicity; age; transferrin saturation; serum ferritin; and HFE p.C282Y and p.H63D alleles. We defined ID using a stringent criterion: combined transferrin saturation ResultsThese 62,685 women included 27,079 whites, 17,272 blacks, 8,566 Hispanics, 7,615 Asians, 449 Pacific Islanders, 441 Native Americans, and 1,263 participants of other race/ethnicity. Proportions of women with ID were higher in Hispanics and blacks than whites and Asians. Prevalence of ID was significantly greater in women ages 25-54 y of all race/ethnicity groups than women ages ≥55 y of corresponding race/ethnicity. In women ages ≥55 y, ID prevalence did not differ significantly across race/ethnicity. p.C282Y and p.H63D prevalence did not differ significantly in women with or without ID, regardless of race/ethnicity, age subgroup, or pregnancy.ConclusionsID prevalence was greater in Hispanic and black than white and Asian women ages 25-54 y. p.C282Y and p.H63D prevalence did not differ significantly in women with or without ID, regardless of race/ethnicity, age subgroup, or pregnancy.