Demand management and optimization of clinical laboratory services in a tertiary referral center in Saudi Arabia

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Demand for clinical laboratory services in our institution has increased by 7% each year in the past 5 years, while the amount budgeted for services has remained fixed. To address the issue, we conducted a pilot study to curb inappropriate demand by implementing a minimum retest interval (time-based restrictions on the ordering certain tests) and thus reduce costs. OBJECTIVE: Explore the impact (financial and work volume) of restricting overuse of laboratory tests that add to costs but provide no additional clinical value. DESIGN: Pilot study of means to reduce costs and workload. SETTING: Clinical laboratory that provides diagnostic support to a tertiary care center specializing in transplantation and oncology. METHODS: With the engagement of clinical colleagues, we selected 13 tests characterized by high volume, high cost, or a perception of overuse that adds no clinical value. The selection was also based on established lock-out frequencies identified in a literature review. Data was captured on test numbers before and after initiating computer-based lock-outs along with the reference laboratory cost of these tests for the first 6 months of 2016 and 2017. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Alterations in testing patterns (mimimum retest intervals) and frequencies for tests. RESULTS: The number of tests ordered during the 6-month period in 2017 were reduced by an average of 6.6% versus the same period for 2016, saving 2.03 million Saudi Arabian Riyals (SAR). Given a 7% annual growth in the preceding 5 years, the volume was reduced by 13% in real terms. The percentage reduction in number of tests ranged from as little as 0.2% for PT to 70.3% for an enzyme immunoassay. Savings were 1.4 million SAR in hematology and 0.36 million SAR in microbiology over the 6-month period. CONCLUSION: Minimum retest intervals using computer-based rules are effective in supporting strategies to manage demand. LIMITATIONS: This approach may not be applicable to all laboratory tests; however, the success of this pilot study would encourage more widespread use of this approach. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.