Patient Selection Approaches in FGFR Inhibitor Trials—Many Paths to the Same End?
Peter Ellinghaus,
Daniel Neureiter,
Hendrik Nogai,
Sebastian Stintzing,
Matthias Ocker
Affiliations
Peter Ellinghaus
Global Clinical Development Oncology, Merck Healthcare KGaA, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany
Daniel Neureiter
Institute of Pathology, University Clinics Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
Hendrik Nogai
Ryvu Therapeutics, 30-394 Krakow, Poland
Sebastian Stintzing
Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology (Campus Charité Mitte), Medical Department, Charité University Medicine Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
Matthias Ocker
Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology (Campus Charité Mitte), Medical Department, Charité University Medicine Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
Inhibitors of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) signaling have been investigated in various human cancer diseases. Recently, the first compounds received FDA approval in biomarker-selected patient populations. Different approaches and technologies have been applied in clinical trials, ranging from protein (immunohistochemistry) to mRNA expression (e.g., RNA in situ hybridization) and to detection of various DNA alterations (e.g., copy number variations, mutations, gene fusions). We review, here, the advantages and limitations of the different technologies and discuss the importance of tissue and disease context in identifying the best predictive biomarker for FGFR targeting therapies.