Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease (May 2024)

Association of Age‐ and Body Mass Index‐Stratified High On‐Treatment Platelet Reactivity With Coronary Intervention Outcomes in East Asian Patients

  • Jung‐Joon Cha,
  • Seung‐Jun Lee,
  • Jae Hyoung Park,
  • Soon Jun Hong,
  • Tae Hoon Ahn,
  • Kiyuk Chang,
  • Yongwhi Park,
  • Young Bin Song,
  • Sung Gyun Ahn,
  • Jung‐Won Suh,
  • Sang Yeub Lee,
  • Jung Rae Cho,
  • Ae‐Young Her,
  • Young‐Hoon Jeong,
  • Hyo‐Soo Kim,
  • Moo Hyun Kim,
  • Eun‐Seok Shin,
  • Byeong‐Keuk Kim,
  • Do‐Sun Lim

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.123.031819
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 9

Abstract

Read online

Background Although age and body mass index (BMI) significantly affect platelet reactivity units and clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention, there are limited data on the relationship between high on‐treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) and clinical outcomes on age and BMI differences. Thus, we investigated the association of HPR with clinical outcomes according to age and BMI. Methods and Results The study analyzed 11 714 patients who underwent platelet function tests after percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary end point was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), whereas the secondary end point was major bleeding. HPR was defined as platelet reactivity units ≥252. Patients were categorized by age (22.6 kg/m2). Patients 22.6 kg/m2 had increases in MACCEs (adjusted HR, 1.387 [95% CI, 1.140–1.688]; P=0.001). No differences were shown in major bleeding. Conclusions HPR was linked to an increase in MACCEs or a decrease in major bleeding in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention, depending on age and BMI. This study is the first to observe that clinical outcomes in patients with HPR after percutaneous coronary intervention may vary based on age and BMI. Because the study is observational, the results should be viewed as hypothesis generating and emphasize the need for randomized clinical trials.

Keywords