Cancer Management and Research (Jun 2020)

Glucose Transporter-1 Cooperating with AKT Signaling Promote Gastric Cancer Progression

  • Zhou D,
  • Jiang L,
  • Jin L,
  • Yao Y,
  • Wang P,
  • Zhu X

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 12
pp. 4151 – 4160

Abstract

Read online

Diyuan Zhou,1,* Linhua Jiang,1,* Lichen Jin,1,* Yizhou Yao,1 Peijie Wang,2 Xinguo Zhu1 1Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China; 2Institute of Mental Health, The Affiliated Guangji Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Xinguo ZhuDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province 215006, People’s Republic of ChinaEmail [email protected] WangInstitute of Mental Health, The Affiliated Guangji Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province 215000, People’s Republic of ChinaEmail [email protected]: High expression of GLUT1 has been observed in numerous solid cancers, facilitating glucose consumption for supporting tumor cell survival. The altered metabolic activity is regulated by series of signaling pathways, including AKT signaling that acts as a key role in glucose metabolism and shows close correlation with the malignant transformation. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the effect of GLUT1 on gastric cancer (GC) and to explore the relation between GLUT1 and AKT signaling.Materials and Methods: GLUT1, p-AKT, and p-S6k1 expression were investigated by immunohistochemistry and semi-quantitative analysis in 57 paired-GC samples. The relationship of GLUT1 with clinical indexes in GC tissues was investigated. The effects of GLUT1 on the prognosis of GC patients and the underlying mechanism involved were studied by subgroup analysis.Results: In GC tissues, an obvious increase in GLUT1 expression was observed when compared with that of normal tissues (P< 0.001). Advanced clinicopathological factors (tumor size P=0.019, invasion depth P=0.002, lymph node metastasis P< 0.001, differentiation P=0.024, neural invasion P=0.003, and TNM staging P=0.001) correlated with high GLUT1 levels. GLUT1 was an independent risk factor resulting in poor prognosis (P=0.002, HR=5.132). GLUT1 increased the activation ratio of p-AKT (P< 0.01) and p-S6K1 (P< 0.001) in GC. The expression of p-S6K1 and GLUT1 was positively correlated. (P=0.001, R=0.173). The survival probability of GC patients with GLUT1(+)/p-S6K1(+) was worse when compared to that of GLUT1(+)/p-S6K1(-) or GLUT1(-)/p-S6K1(+) (P< 0.001).Conclusion: High expression of GLUT1 facilitated GC progression, leading to poor prognosis. Overexpression of GLUT1 activated AKT-S6K1 axis, resulting in adverse outcomes of GC. GLUT1 is novel indicator of GC prognosis and GLUT1 targeted metabolic treatment that has potential therapeutic value.Keywords: AKT, gastric cancer, GLUT1, S6K1

Keywords