Arthritis Research & Therapy (Feb 2023)

Relationship of systemic type I interferon activity with clinical phenotypes, disease activity, and damage accrual in systemic lupus erythematosus in treatment-naive patients: a retrospective longitudinal analysis

  • Kazusa Miyachi,
  • Taro Iwamoto,
  • Shotaro Kojima,
  • Tomoaki Ida,
  • Junya Suzuki,
  • Takuya Yamamoto,
  • Norihiro Mimura,
  • Takahiro Sugiyama,
  • Shigeru Tanaka,
  • Shunsuke Furuta,
  • Kei Ikeda,
  • Kotaro Suzuki,
  • Timothy B. Niewold,
  • Hiroshi Nakajima

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-023-03010-0
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 25, no. 1
pp. 1 – 13

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is heterogeneous in organ involvement and disease severity, presenting a broad clinical phenotype. Systemic type I interferon (IFN) activity has been shown to be associated with lupus nephritis, autoantibodies, and disease activity in treated SLE patients; however, these relationships are unknown in treatment-naive patients. We aimed to determine the relationship of systemic IFN activity with clinical phenotypes, disease activity, and damage accrual in treatment-naive SLE patients before and after induction and maintenance therapy. Methods Forty treatment-naive SLE patients were enrolled for this retrospective longitudinal observational study to examine the relationship between serum IFN activity and clinical manifestations of EULAR/ACR-2019 criteria domains, disease activity measures, and damage accrual. As controls, 59 other treatment-naive rheumatic disease patients and 33 healthy individuals were recruited. Serum IFN activity was measured by WISH bioassay and presented as an IFN activity score. Results Treatment-naive SLE patients had significantly higher serum IFN activity than other rheumatic disease patients (score: 97.6 and 0.0, respectively, p < 0.001). High serum IFN activity was significantly associated with fever, hematologic disorders (leukopenia), and mucocutaneous manifestations (acute cutaneous lupus and oral ulcer) of EULAR/ACR-2019 criteria domains in treatment-naive SLE patients. Serum IFN activity at baseline significantly correlated with SLEDAI-2K scores and decreased along with a decrease in SLEDAI-2K scores after induction and maintenance therapy (R 2 = 0.112, p = 0.034). SLE patients who developed organ damage (SDI ≥ 1) had higher serum IFN activity at baseline than those who did not (SDI = 0) (150.0 versus 57.3, p= 0.018), but the multivariate analysis did not detect its independent significance (p = 0.132). Conclusions Serum IFN activity is characteristically high and is linked to fever, hematologic disorders, and mucocutaneous manifestations in treatment-naive SLE patients. Serum IFN activity at baseline correlates with disease activity and decreases in parallel with a decrease in disease activity after induction and maintenance therapy. Our results suggest that IFN plays an important role in the pathophysiology of SLE and that serum IFN activity at baseline may be a potential biomarker for the disease activity in treatment-naive SLE patients.

Keywords