Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (Mar 2023)

Effect of Deep Cervical Flexor versus Core Stability Exercises on Range of Motion and Function in Individuals with Forward Head Posture-A Research Protocol

  • Sakshi Padmawar,
  • Deepali Patil

DOI
https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/58905.17534
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 3
pp. YK01 – YK03

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: The human spine forms cervical and lumbar lordosis and thoracic kyphosis when it is aligned in the sagittal plane against a vertical reference. When the head protrudes forward from the sagittal plane and appears to be in front of the body, it is called Forward Head Posture (FHP). The atlantooccipital joint and upper cervical vertebrae extend, whereas the lower cervical and upper thoracic vertebrae flex. FHP puts more strain on the neck causing problems with the musculoskeletal, neurological, and respiratory systems. The Deep Cervical Flexor (DCF) muscles have been revealed to have an important role in the cervical spine’s support and strengthening. FHP is one of the most typical incorrect postures that has increased in popularity recently. Aim: To compare the impact of Core Stability Exercises (CSE) to DCF exercises on people who have a FHP. Materials and Methods: In this interventional comparative study, a total of 70 patients with FHP and neck pain will be included with Craniovertebral Angle (CVA) less than 50o. They will be divided into two equal groups. After a warm-up, Group A will receive DCF exercises while Group B will receive CSE for four weeks, and pain, range, and function will be assessed at the beginning, after two weeks, and after four weeks of intervention. Pain will be assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), range will be evaluated with a goniometer, and function will be assessed by Neck Disability Index (NDI). The statistical tests used will be Chi-square test and the Student t-test. Expected Outcome: It is hypothesised that DCF exercises will prove to be successful in improving the ROM and function in individuals aged between 20-40 years with FHP. Conclusion: The conclusion will be drawn based on the effect of both the techniques on pain, range, and function in individuals with FHP which will help patients and the therapist in a better approach to rehabilitation.

Keywords