The Physicochemical Parameters, Phenolic Content, and Antioxidant Activity of Honey from Stingless Bees and <i>Apis mellifera</i>: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Ana Karen Zaldivar-Ortega,
Antonio de Jesús Cenobio-Galindo,
Nuria Morfin,
Gabriel Aguirre-Álvarez,
Rafael G. Campos-Montiel,
Nuria Esturau-Escofet,
Angel Garduño-García,
Juan Carlos Angeles-Hernandez
Affiliations
Ana Karen Zaldivar-Ortega
Instituto de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Avenida Universidad Km. 1 s/n Exhacienda Aquetzalpa, Tulancingo 43600, Mexico
Antonio de Jesús Cenobio-Galindo
Instituto de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Avenida Universidad Km. 1 s/n Exhacienda Aquetzalpa, Tulancingo 43600, Mexico
Nuria Morfin
Michael Smith Laboratories, Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T1Z4, Canada
Gabriel Aguirre-Álvarez
Instituto de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Avenida Universidad Km. 1 s/n Exhacienda Aquetzalpa, Tulancingo 43600, Mexico
Rafael G. Campos-Montiel
Instituto de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Avenida Universidad Km. 1 s/n Exhacienda Aquetzalpa, Tulancingo 43600, Mexico
Nuria Esturau-Escofet
Instituto de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico
Angel Garduño-García
Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica Agrícola, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Carretera México-Texcoco, Km 38.5, Texcoco 56230, Mexico
Juan Carlos Angeles-Hernandez
Departamento de Medicina y Zootecnia de Rumiantes, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico
The most common bee species used for honey production is Apis mellifera (A. mellifera), followed by stingless bees. This study included scientific articles using the PRISMA approach. A random effect model was implemented and the effect size (ES) was calculated and reported as the standardized mean difference (SMD) and raw mean difference (RMD). The mean phenolic content in A. mellifera honey was 61.21 ± 28.3 mg GAE/100 g and stingless bee honey +33.69 mg GAE/100 g; p = 0.01. The antioxidant activity, discovered by the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) method, showed a mean of 97.34 ± 7.84 μmol Fe(II)/100 g in A. mellifera and stingless bee honey +63.39 μmol Fe(II)/100 g; p = 0.009. The physicochemical properties showed significant differences in moisture (A. mellifera honey 19.54 ± 3.65%; stingless bee honey +8.02%; p = 0.0001), hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) (A. mellifera honey 20.14 ± 16.27 mg/kg; stingless bee honey −11.25 mg/kg; p = 0.001), and free acidity (A. mellifera honey 31.32 ± 16.67 meq/kg; stingless bee honey +34.76 meq/kg; p = 0.01). The variability in the trials was explained by the heterogeneity, and a meta-regression analysis incorporated four covariates: (1) stingless bee species; (2) floral source; (3) country, and (4) latitude. This study highlights the importance of conducting further studies on stingless bee honey.