BMC Cancer (Sep 2024)

Evaluation of the invasiveness of pure ground-glass nodules based on dual-head ResNet technique

  • Dengfa Yang,
  • Yang Yang,
  • MinYi Zhao,
  • Hongli Ji,
  • Zhongfeng Niu,
  • Bo Hong,
  • Hengfeng Shi,
  • Linyang He,
  • Meihua Shao,
  • Jian Wang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-12823-4
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 24, no. 1
pp. 1 – 11

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Objective To intelligently evaluate the invasiveness of pure ground-glass nodules with multiple classifications using deep learning. Methods pGGNs in 1136 patients were pathologically confirmed as lung precursor lesions [atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH) and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS)], minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), or invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC). Four different models [EfficientNet-b0 2D, dual-head ResNet_3D, a 3D model combining three features (3D_3F), and a 3D model combining 19 features (3D_19F)] were constructed to evaluate the invasiveness of pGGNs using the EfficientNet and ResNet networks. The Obuchowski index was used to evaluate the differences in diagnostic efficiency among the four models. Results The patients with pGGNs (360 men, 776 women; mean age, 54.63 ± 12.36 years) included 235 cases of AAH + AIS, 332 cases of MIA, and 569 cases of IAC. In the validation group, the areas under the curve in detecting the invasiveness of pGGNs as a three-category classification (AAH + AIS, MIA, IAC) were 0.8008, 0.8090, 0.8165, and 0.8158 for EfficientNet-b0 2D, dual-head ResNet_3D, 3D_3F, and 3D_19F, respectively, whereas the accuracies were 0.6422, 0.6158, 0.651, and 0.6364, respectively. The Obuchowski index revealed no significant differences in the diagnostic performance of the four models. Conclusions The dual-head ResNet_3D_3F model had the highest diagnostic efficiency for evaluating the invasiveness of pGGNs in the four models.

Keywords