Veterinary Quarterly (Jan 2020)

Osteogenesis imperfecta in a male holstein calf associated with a possible oligogenic origin

  • Xuying Zhang,
  • Marc Hirschfeld,
  • Julia Beck,
  • Alexandra Kupke,
  • Kernt Köhler,
  • Ekkehard Schütz,
  • Bertram Brenig

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01652176.2020.1721611
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 40, no. 1
pp. 58 – 67

Abstract

Read online

Background Neuromusculoskeletal anomalies generally in combination with severe clinical symptoms, comprise a heterogeneous group of fairly common and mostly fatal disorders in man and animals. Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), also known as brittle bone disease, causes bone fragility and deformity. Prominent extra-skeletal accessory manifestations of OI comprise blue/gray sclerae, hearing impairment, lung abnormalities and hypercalciuria. Cases of OI in cattle have been reported. However, no causative mutations have been identified in cattle so far. Aim To report a possible oligogenic origin identified in a calf from clinically healthy parents suffering from OI. Materials and Methods A neonatal embryo transfer male Holstein calf developing multiple fractures with bone tissue showing marked osteopenia was used for whole genome re-sequencing as well as its parents. In addition, 2,612 randomly chosen healthy Holstein cattle were genotyped as well as controls. Results Sixteen candidate genes with potential protein-altering variants were selected revealing non-synonymous variants only within IFITM5 and CRTAP genes. However, in-depth gene analysis did not result in the identification of a single causative mutation in the OI calf. Conclusion The analysis of the OI case revealed a possible oligogenic origin of the disease attributable to additive effects of three candidate genes, i.e., ABCA13, QRFPR, and IFTIM5. Clinical relevance Most OI cases in humans and domestic animals reported so far are caused by distinct dominant or recessive monogenic mutations, therefore a potential oligogenic additive genetic effect is a novel finding. Furthermore, the case presented here demonstrates that cross-species genetic analyses might not always be straightforward.

Keywords