European Urology Open Science (Mar 2022)

Association Between a 22-feature Genomic Classifier and Biopsy Gleason Upgrade During Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer

  • Benjamin H. Press,
  • Tashzna Jones,
  • Olamide Olawoyin,
  • Soum D. Lokeshwar,
  • Syed N. Rahman,
  • Ghazal Khajir,
  • Daniel W. Lin,
  • Matthew R. Cooperberg,
  • Stacy Loeb,
  • Burcu F. Darst,
  • Yingye Zheng,
  • Ronald C. Chen,
  • John S. Witte,
  • Tyler M. Seibert,
  • William J. Catalona,
  • Michael S. Leapman,
  • Preston C. Sprenkle

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 37
pp. 113 – 119

Abstract

Read online

Background: Although the Decipher genomic classifier has been validated as a prognostic tool for several prostate cancer endpoints, little is known about its role in assessing the risk of biopsy reclassification for patients on active surveillance, a key event that often triggers treatment. Objective: To evaluate the association between Decipher genomic classifier scores and biopsy Gleason upgrading among patients on active surveillance. Design, setting, and participants: This was a retrospective cohort study among patients with low- and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer on active surveillance who underwent biopsy-based Decipher testing as part of their clinical care. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: We evaluated the association between the Decipher score and any increase in biopsy Gleason grade group (GG) using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. We compared the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for models comprising baseline clinical variables with or without the Decipher score. Results and limitations: We identified 133 patients for inclusion with a median age of 67.7 yr and median prostate-specific of 5.6 ng/ml. At enrollment, 75.9% had GG1 and 24.1% had GG2 disease. Forty-three patients experienced biopsy upgrading. On multivariable logistic regression, the Decipher score was significantly associated with biopsy upgrading (odds ratio 1.37 per 0.10 unit increase, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05–1.79; p = 0.02). The Decipher score was associated with upgrading among patients with biopsy GG 1 disease, but not GG2 disease. The discriminative ability of a clinical model (AUC 0.63, 95% CI 0.51–0.74) was improved by integration of the Decipher score (AUC 0.69, 95% CI 0.58–0.80). Conclusions: The Decipher genomic classifier score was associated with short-term biopsy Gleason upgrading among patients on active surveillance. Patient summary: The results from this study indicate that among patients with prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance, those with higher Decipher scores were more likely to have higher-grade disease found over time. These findings indicate that the Decipher test might be useful for guiding the intensity of monitoring during active surveillance, such as more frequent biopsy for patients with higher scores.

Keywords