Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Jan 2019)

Integrative Genome-Scale DNA Methylation Analysis of a Large and Unselected Cohort Reveals 5 Distinct Subtypes of Colorectal AdenocarcinomasSummary

  • Lochlan Fennell,
  • Troy Dumenil,
  • Leesa Wockner,
  • Gunter Hartel,
  • Katia Nones,
  • Catherine Bond,
  • Jennifer Borowsky,
  • Cheng Liu,
  • Diane McKeone,
  • Lisa Bowdler,
  • Grant Montgomery,
  • Kerenaftali Klein,
  • Isabell Hoffmann,
  • Ann-Marie Patch,
  • Stephen Kazakoff,
  • John Pearson,
  • Nicola Waddell,
  • Pratyaksha Wirapati,
  • Paul Lochhead,
  • Yu Imamura,
  • Shuji Ogino,
  • Renfu Shao,
  • Sabine Tejpar,
  • Barbara Leggett,
  • Vicki Whitehall

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 2
pp. 269 – 290

Abstract

Read online

Background & Aims: Colorectal cancer is an epigenetically heterogeneous disease, however, the extent and spectrum of the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) is not clear. Methods: Genome-scale methylation and transcript expression were measured by DNA Methylation and RNA expression microarray in 216 unselected colorectal cancers, and findings were validated using The Cancer Genome Atlas 450K and RNA sequencing data. Mutations in epigenetic regulators were assessed using CIMP-subtyped Cancer Genome Atlas exomes. Results: CIMP-high cancers dichotomized into CIMP-H1 and CIMP-H2 based on methylation profile. KRAS mutation was associated significantly with CIMP-H2 cancers, but not CIMP-H1 cancers. Congruent with increasing methylation, there was a stepwise increase in patient age from 62 years in the CIMP-negative subgroup to 75 years in the CIMP-H1 subgroup (P < .0001). CIMP-H1 predominantly comprised consensus molecular subtype 1 cancers (70%) whereas consensus molecular subtype 3 was over-represented in the CIMP-H2 subgroup (55%). Polycomb Repressive Complex-2 (PRC2)-marked loci were subjected to significant gene body methylation in CIMP cancers (P < 1.6 × 10-78). We identified oncogenes susceptible to gene body methylation and Wnt pathway antagonists resistant to gene body methylation. CIMP cluster–specific mutations were observed in chromatin remodeling genes, such as in the SWItch/Sucrose Non-Fermentable and Chromodomain Helicase DNA-Binding gene families. Conclusions: There are 5 clinically and molecularly distinct subgroups of colorectal cancer. We show a striking association between CIMP and age, sex, and tumor location, and identify a role for gene body methylation in the progression of serrated neoplasia. These data support our recent findings that CIMP is uncommon in young patients and that BRAF mutant polyps in young patients may have limited potential for malignant progression. Keywords: DNA Methylation, CIMP, Colorectal Cancer, Epigenetics, BRAF, KRAS