Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology (Nov 2023)

Abstract 063: Emergent versus delayed carotid artery stenting in tandem occlusion strokes treated with thrombectomy

  • Nader El Seblani,
  • Saurabh Kalra,
  • Santiago Ortega‐Gutierrez,
  • Deepak Kalra,
  • Nandakumar Nagaraja

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/SVIN.03.suppl_2.063
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 3, no. S2

Abstract

Read online

Introduction It is controversial when to pursue carotid artery stenting (CAS) after acute tandem occlusion (TO) strokes treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). We conducted a retrospective observational study to evaluate the clinical and safety outcomes of emergent versus delayed CAS in the first week of EVT. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, using 2016‐19 Nationwide Readmissions Database, we identified patients with acute ischemic stroke who had EVT for anterior circulation large vessel occlusions (LVOs) and CAS up to 7 days of EVT. CAS performed on day ‐1, 0 or 1 day after admission was considered as emergent CAS. CAS performed 2‐7 days after EVT was defined as delayed CAS. The primary clinical outcomes were all‐cause mortality during same admission. Secondary safety outcomes included intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), seizures, gastric tube (G‐tube) insertion, > 24‐hours mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, length of stay (LOS), and discharge location (home vs. others). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to compare outcomes in emergent CAS group in comparison to delayed CAS group. Age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and use of thromobolytics were considered as covariates. Results We identified total of 1990 hospitalizations meeting the study inclusion criteria (mean age: 67 years ± standard deviation:12 years, female 612 (31%). Of these, 1745 (87%) had undergone emergent CAS with EVT and 245 (13%) had delayed CAS (2‐7 days) pos‐EVT. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two cohorts. Delayed CAS cohort had significantly less mortality rates [6 vs 13%; OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.24‐0.78], less ICH [20 vs 30%; OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.43‐0.82¬¬], less cerebral edema [16 vs 23%; OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.44‐0.96], and less mechanical ventilation for >24‐hours [11 vs 18%; OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.34‐0.85]. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups for tracheostomy, G‐tube placements, new‐onset seizure, and mean LOS. Conclusion Delaying CAS for 2‐7 days after EVT might be a safer approach for endovascular revascularization in anterior circulation LVO strokes secondary to tandem lesions.