Cancer Biology & Medicine (Aug 2021)

Equivalent efficacy study of QL1101 and bevacizumab on untreated advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer patients: a phase 3 randomized, double-blind clinical trial

  • Tianqing Chu,
  • Jun Lu,
  • Minghong Bi,
  • Helong Zhang,
  • Wu Zhuang,
  • Yan Yu,
  • Jianhua Shi,
  • Zhendong Chen,
  • Xiaochun Zhang,
  • Qisen Guo,
  • Quan Liu,
  • Huijuan Wu,
  • Jian Fang,
  • Yi Hu,
  • Xiuwen Wang,
  • Cuicui Han,
  • Kai Li,
  • Baohui Han

DOI
https://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2020.0212
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 3
pp. 816 – 824

Abstract

Read online

Objective: This phase 3 study aimed to test equivalence in efficacy and safety for QL1101, a bevacizumab analogue in Chinese patients with untreated locally advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Eligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive carboplatin and paclitaxel in combination with either QL1101 or bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg every 3-week for 6 cycles. This was followed by maintenance treatment with single agent QL1101 every 3-week. The primary end-point was objective response rate (ORR), with secondary end-points being progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs). Results: Of 675 patients, 535 eligible patients were randomized to the QL1101 group (n = 269) and bevacizumab group (n = 266). ORRs were 52.8% and 56.8%, respectively, for the QL1101 and bevacizumab groups, with an ORR hazard ratio 0.93 (95% confidence interval: 0.8–0131.1). The PFS, OS, DCR, and AEs were comparable between the 2 groups, which remained the same after stratification according to epidermal growth factor receptor mutation or smoking history. Conclusions: QL1101 showed similar efficacy and safety profiles as compared to bevacizumab among Chinese patients with untreated locally advanced non-squamous NSCLC.

Keywords