Journal of Pain Research (Feb 2022)

Comparisons of Ultrasound-Guided Platelet-Rich Plasma Intra-Articular Injection and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Treating ARCO I–III Symptomatic Non-Traumatic Femoral Head Necrosis: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

  • Luan S,
  • Wang S,
  • Lin C,
  • Fan S,
  • Liu C,
  • Ma C,
  • Wu S

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 15
pp. 341 – 354

Abstract

Read online

Shuo Luan,* Shaoling Wang,* Caina Lin, Shengnuo Fan, Cuicui Liu, Chao Ma, Shaoling Wu Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, SunYat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Shaoling Wu; Chao Ma, Email [email protected]; [email protected] and Objective: Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a devastating disease, and there is some evidence that extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) and intra-articular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection might alleviate pain and improve joint function in individuals with ONFH. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of PRP and ESWT in symptomatic ONFH patients.Methods: A total of 60 patients aged 40– 79 with unilateral ONFH at Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) stages I, II, and III were randomly assigned to the PRP (N=30) or the ESWT group (N=30). Four treatment sessions were provided in both groups. Assessments were performed at baseline, and 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month. Primary outcomes were measured by the visual analogue scale (VAS), and pressure pain thresholds (PPTs). Secondary outcomes were assessed by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Harris Hip Score (HHS), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The linear mixed-model analysis was used to evaluate the differences between groups and within groups and the “group by time” interaction effects.Results: There were significant differences between groups in terms of changes over time for VAS, PPTs, WOMAC, and HHS since 3-month and maintained up to 12-month (P< 0.05, except for PPTs at 12-month). The simple main effects showed that the patients in PRP group had greater improvements in VAS (mean difference = − 0.82, 95% CI [− 1.39, − 0.25], P=0.005), WOMAC (mean difference = − 4.19, 95% CI [− 7.00, − 1.37], P=0.004), and HHS (mean difference = 5.28, 95% CI [1.94, 8.62], P=0.002). No related adverse events were reported.Conclusion: This study supported the effectiveness and safety of both the PRP injection and ESWT in treating ONFH patients. For symptomatic patients with ONFH, intra-articular PRP injection appeared superior to ESWT in pain relief and functional improvement.Keywords: necrosis of the femoral head, platelet-rich plasma, ultrasound-guided intra-articular injection, extracorporeal shock wave therapy

Keywords