Development and Validation of Case-Finding Algorithms for Digestive Cancer in the Spanish Healthcare Database BIFAP

Abstract

Background: electronic health records (EHRs) are helpful tools in epidemiology despite not being primarily collected for research. In Spain, primary care physicians play a central role and manage patients even in specialized care. All of this introduces variability that may lead to diagnostic inconsistencies. Therefore, data validation studies are crucial, so we aimed to develop and validate case-finding algorithms for digestive cancer in the primary care database BIFAP. Methods: from 2001 to 2019, subjects aged 40–89 without a cancer history were included. Case-finding algorithms using diagnostic codes and text-mining were built. We randomly sampled, clustered, and manually reviewed 816 EHRs. Then, positive predictive values (PPVs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for each cancer were computed. Age and sex standardized incidence rates (SIRs) were compared with those reported by the National Cancer Registry (REDECAN). Results: we identified 95,672 potential cases. After validation, the PPV (95% CI) for hepato-biliary cancer was 87.6% (81.8–93.4), for esophageal cancer, it was 96.2% (93.1–99.2), for pancreatic cancer, it was 89.4% (84.5–94.3), for gastric cancer, it was 92.5% (88.3–96.6), and for colorectal cancer, it was 95.2% (92.1–98.4). The SIRs were comparable to those reported by the REDECAN. Conclusions: the case-finding algorithms demonstrated high performance, supporting BIFAP as a suitable source of information to conduct epidemiologic studies of digestive cancer.

Keywords

• electronic health databases
• digestive cancer
• validation study
• electronic health records
• pharmacoepidemiology