Remote Sensing (Nov 2024)

Automating the Derivation of Sugarcane Growth Stages from Earth Observation Time Series

  • Neha Joshi,
  • Daniel M. Simms,
  • Paul J. Burgess

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16224244
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 22
p. 4244

Abstract

Read online

Sugarcane is a high-impact crop used in the majority of global sugar production, with India being the second largest global producer. Understanding the timing and length of sugarcane growth stages is critical to improving the sustainability of sugarcane management. Earth observation (EO) data have been shown to be sensitive to the variation in sugarcane growth, but questions remain as to how to reliably extract sugarcane phenology over wide areas so that this information can be used for effective management. This study develops an automated approach to derive sugarcane growth stages using EO data from Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 satellite data in the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh. The developed method is then evaluated in the State of Telangana. Normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI) EO data from Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 were pre-processed to filter out clouds and to harmonise sensor response. Pixel-based cloud filtering was selected over filtering by scene in order to increase the temporal frequency of observations. Harmonising data from two different sensors further increased temporal resolution to 3–6 days (70% of sampled fields). To automate seasonal decomposition, harmonised signals were resampled at 14 days, and low-frequency components, related to seasonal growth, were extracted using a fast Fourier transform. The start and end of each season were extracted from the time series using difference of Gaussian and were compared to assessments based on visual observation for both Unit 1 (R2 = 0.72–0.84) and Unit 2 (R2 = 0.78–0.82). A trapezoidal growth model was then used to derive crop growth stages from satellite-measured phenology for better crop management information. Automated assessments of the start and the end of mid-season growth stages were compared to visual observations in Unit 1 (R2 = 0.56–0.72) and Unit 2 (R2 = 0.36–0.79). Outliers were found to result from cloud cover that was not removed by the initial screening as well as multiple crops or harvesting dates within a single field. These results demonstrate that EO time series can be used to automatically determine the growth stages of sugarcane in India over large areas, without the need for prior knowledge of planting and harvest dates, as a tool for improving sustainable production.

Keywords