Lipids in Health and Disease (Aug 2024)

Cross-talk between oxidative stress and lipid metabolism regulators reveals molecular clusters and immunological characterization in polycystic ovarian syndrome

  • Cuiyu Tan,
  • Shuqiang Huang,
  • Liying Xu,
  • Tongtong Zhang,
  • Xiaojun Yuan,
  • Zhihong Li,
  • Miaoqi Chen,
  • Cairong Chen,
  • Qiuxia Yan

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-024-02237-3
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 23, no. 1
pp. 1 – 17

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Changes in the oxidative stress and lipid metabolism (OSLM) pathways play important roles in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) pathogenesis and development. Consequently, a systematic analysis of genes related to OSLM was conducted to identify molecular clusters and explore new biomarkers that are helpful for the diagnostic of PCOS. Methods Gene expression and clinical data from 22 PCOS women and 14 normal women were obtained from the GEO database (GSE34526, GSE95728, and GSE106724). Consensus clustering identified OSLM-related molecular clusters, and WGCNA revealed co-expression patterns. The immune microenvironment was quantitatively assessed utilizing the CIBERSORT algorithm. Multiple machine learning models and connectivity map analyses were subsequently applied to explore potential biomarkers for PCOS, and nomograms were employed to develop a predictive multigene model of PCOS. Finally, the OSLM status of PCOS and the hub genes expression profiles were preliminarily verified using TUNEL, qRT‒PCR, western blot, and IHC assays in a PCOS mouse model. Results 19 differential expression genes (DEGs) related to OSLM were identified. Based on 19 DEGs that were strongly influenced by OSLM, PCOS patients were stratified into two distinct clusters, designated Cluster 1 and Cluster 2. Distinct differences in the immune cell proportions existed in normal and two PCOS clusters. The random forest showed the best results, with the least cross-entropy and the utmost AUC (cross-entropy: 0.111 AUC: 0.960). Among the 19 OSLM-related genes, CXCR1, ACP5, CEACAM3, S1PR4, and TCF7 were identified by a Bayesian network and had a good fit with PCOS disease risk by the nomogram (AUC: 0.990 CI: 0.968–1.000). TUNEL assays revealed more severe DNA damage within the ovarian granule cells of PCOS mice than in those of normal mice (P < 0.001). The RNA and protein expression levels of the five hub genes were significantly elevated in PCOS mice, which was consistent with the results of the bioinformatics analyses. Conclusion A novel predictive model was constructed for PCOS patients and five hub genes were identified as potential biomarkers to offer novel insights into clinical diagnostic strategies for PCOS.

Keywords