BMC Primary Care (May 2024)

Addressing food insecurity in rural primary care: a mixed-methods evaluation of barriers and facilitators

  • Kayla E. Jordanova,
  • Arvind Suresh,
  • Chelsey R. Canavan,
  • Tiffany D’cruze,
  • Alka Dev,
  • Maureen Boardman,
  • Meaghan A. Kennedy

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02409-1
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 25, no. 1
pp. 1 – 11

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Food insecurity (FI) is associated with negative health outcomes and increased healthcare utilization. Rural populations face increased rates of FI and encounter additional barriers to achieving food security. We sought to identify barriers and facilitators to screening and interventions for FI in rural primary care practices. Methods We conducted a mixed-methods study using surveys and semi-structured interviews of providers and staff members from rural primary care practices in northern New England. Survey data were analyzed descriptively, and thematic analysis was used to identify salient interview themes. Results Participants from 24 rural practices completed the survey, and 13 subsequently completed an interview. Most survey respondents (54%) reported their practices systematically screen for FI and 71% reported food needs were “very important” for their patients and communities. Time and resource constraints were the most frequently cited barriers to screening for and addressing FI in practices based on survey results. Interview themes were categorized by screening and intervention procedures, community factors, patient factors, external factors, practice factors, process and implementation factors, and impact of FI screening and interventions. Time and resource constraints were a major theme in interviews, and factors attributed to rural practice settings included geographically large service areas, stigma from loss of privacy in small communities, and availability of food resources through farming. Conclusions Rural primary care practices placed a high value on addressing food needs but faced a variety of barriers to implementing and sustaining FI screening and interventions. Strategies that utilize practice strengths and address time and resource constraints, stigma, and large service areas could promote the adoption of novel interventions to address FI.

Keywords