Old Testament Essays (Dec 2017)

A Comment on Ehud Ben Zvi’s Total Exile, Empty Land and the General Intellectual Discourse in Yehud.

  • Ntozakhe Simon Cezula

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 30, no. 3

Abstract

Read online

The Judeans of the Late Persian era could not interpret the “empty land” myth in any other way other than inclusively, including Ezra-Nehemiah, so argues Ehud Ben Zvi. This transpires from his social memory analysis of thepentateuchal, Deuteronomistic history and prophetic literature. The logic in his argument is so persuasive that it compels a review of one’s stance on the exclusivity of Ezra-Nehemiah. After some more engagement with Ezra-Nehemiah this paper remains convinced that Ezra-Nehemiah is exclusive and the “empty land’ myth is applied in an exclusive perspective. Of great concern however, is the fact that Ben Zvi’s argument comes at a time when Africans are engaged in a quest for a biblical paradigm for a theology of reconstruction that is being contemplated. Particularly of concern is that some suggest Nehemiah as a paradigm for a theology of reconstruction in Africa just as Moses and the Exodus were for the theology of liberation. For historical reasons this paper rejects Nehemiah as a biblical paradigm for a theology of reconstruction in Africa. This paper engages with Ben Zvi’s paper titled “Total Exile, Empty Land and the General Intellectual Discourse in Yehud” against this background.

Keywords